Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] induced emf and induced current



I thought EMF originally applied to electro-chemical cells.

bc will henceforth use literage meterage, celciusage (kelvinage), hertzage, etc. along with voltage and amperage.


Wiki. "thinks" its definition is

Voltage is commonly used as a short name for electrical potential difference.


and:


"In conduction processes occurring in metals and most other solids, electric currents consist almost exclusively of the flow of electrons in the direction B to A. This movement of electrons is controlled by differences in a so-called "total local thermodynamic potential" often denoted by the symbol µ ("mu"). This parameter is often called the "local Fermi level" or sometimes the "(local) electrochemical potential of an electron" or the "total (local) chemical potential of an electron". The modern electron-based definition of voltage (VA − VB) is in terms of differences in µ:"


Note the caveats:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage

Finally:

"A common misapprehension is to assume that difference in voltage is always equal to difference in electric potential (i.e. electrostatic potential). This is often untrue, because differences in "chemical effects" (e.g., as between conductors made from different materials) also contribute to differences in µ, and hence to differences in voltage. Some textbooks (especially old physics textbooks) give historic definitions of voltage that are not strictly equivalent to the modern definition. However, the difference in value between a "voltage difference" and the related "electric potential difference" is always small (at most a few volts, often less), and in many contexts it is commonplace (and acceptable) to disregard the distinction. Nonetheless, in some contexts, such as the theory of contact potential differences, the distinction is vital."




On 2009, Oct 10, , at 09:56, John Denker wrote:

Depending on context, "emf" translates to:
-- the plain old voltage
-- the Thévenin equivalent open-circuit voltage
__________________