Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of October, 2009
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: [Phys-l] Phys-l Digest, Vol 56, Issue 21
,
09/30/2009 22:22, Julie Quah
Re: [Phys-l] Memory and how it works
,
10/01/2009 01:42, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Memory and how it works
,
10/01/2009 02:18, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Memory and how it works
,
10/01/2009 02:33, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Memory and how it works
,
10/01/2009 02:49, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Memory and how it works
,
10/01/2009 02:54, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Holographic Dark Energy in Induced Gravity Trying Again
,
10/01/2009 07:44, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Holographic Dark Energy in Induced Gravity Trying Again
,
10/01/2009 09:12, WC Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] Peer instruction in an online setting: evaluation results?
,
10/01/2009 14:13, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Berkely idealism revived
,
10/01/2009 15:22, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Memory and how it works
,
10/01/2009 22:45, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Memory and how it works
,
10/01/2009 22:52, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Memory and how it works
,
10/01/2009 23:04, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Memory and how it works
,
10/01/2009 23:11, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Holographic Dark Energy in Induced Gravity Trying Again
,
10/01/2009 23:15, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Holographic Dark Energy in Induced Gravity Trying Again
,
10/01/2009 23:21, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Memory and how it works
,
10/02/2009 00:07, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Memory and how it works
,
10/02/2009 00:29, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Memory and how it works
,
10/02/2009 15:42, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Memory and how it works
,
10/02/2009 16:45, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Aerodynamics for beginners (includes false lift theories)
,
10/02/2009 18:30, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Toying with Domestic Waste Heat Recovery
,
10/05/2009 22:33, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Toying with Domestic Waste Heat Recovery
,
10/05/2009 23:10, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Toying with Domestic Waste Heat Recovery
,
10/06/2009 02:19, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] induced emf and induced current
,
10/06/2009 23:43, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] induced emf and induced current
,
10/07/2009 10:57, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Master Violin Materials
,
10/07/2009 20:38, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Master Violin Materials
,
10/07/2009 22:10, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Master Violin Materials
,
10/07/2009 22:40, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Master Violin Materials - Erratum
,
10/08/2009 22:28, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] induced emf and induced current
,
10/09/2009 06:13, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] induced emf and induced current
,
10/09/2009 17:00, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Energy Efficiency, the Jevons Paradox, and the Elephant in the Room: Overpopulation
,
10/09/2009 18:10, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] induced emf and induced current
,
10/09/2009 18:47, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] induced emf and induced current
,
10/09/2009 20:47, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] induced emf and induced current
,
10/09/2009 21:38, Chuck Britton
Re: [Phys-l] induced emf and induced current
,
10/10/2009 12:57, John Denker
[Phys-l] Static vs kinetic friction
,
10/12/2009 12:18, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Static vs kinetic friction
,
10/12/2009 12:29, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Static vs kinetic friction
,
10/12/2009 12:37, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Static vs kinetic friction
,
10/12/2009 13:32, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Static vs kinetic friction
,
10/12/2009 13:50, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Static vs kinetic friction
,
10/12/2009 15:14, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Static vs kinetic friction
,
10/12/2009 17:22, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Static vs kinetic friction
,
10/13/2009 01:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] induced emf and induced current
,
10/13/2009 01:52, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] induced emf and induced current
,
10/13/2009 02:11, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] induced emf and induced current
,
10/13/2009 03:07, John Denker
[Phys-l] how not to do thermodynamics and Legendre transformations
,
10/13/2009 05:16, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] induced emf and induced current
,
10/13/2009 07:11, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] induced emf and induced current
,
10/13/2009 09:08, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] emf, voltage, potential difference (was induced emf...)
,
10/13/2009 10:00, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] induced emf and induced current
,
10/13/2009 10:06, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] emf, voltage, potential difference (was induced emf...)
,
10/13/2009 11:03, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] how not to do thermodynamics and Legendre transformations
,
10/13/2009 11:37, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] emf, voltage, potential difference (was induced emf...)
,
10/13/2009 12:53, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] how not to do thermodynamics and Legendre transformations
,
10/13/2009 13:55, Carl Mungan
[Phys-l] Static vs kinetic friction
,
10/13/2009 14:04, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] Static vs kinetic friction
,
10/13/2009 16:18, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] how not to do thermodynamics and Legendre transformations
,
10/13/2009 18:00, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] how not to do thermodynamics and Legendre transformations
,
10/14/2009 15:17, John Denker
[Phys-l] spin ice monopoles?
,
10/15/2009 06:49, Mark Sylvester
Re: [Phys-l] spin ice monopoles?
,
10/15/2009 07:43, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] spin ice monopoles?
,
10/15/2009 11:13, Chuck Britton
Re: [Phys-l] spin ice monopoles?
,
10/15/2009 11:29, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: [Phys-l] spin ice monopoles?
,
10/15/2009 12:17, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] spin ice monopoles?
,
10/15/2009 12:48, Stefan Jeglinski
[Phys-l] lead brick
,
10/15/2009 14:57, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] lead brick
,
10/15/2009 15:01, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] lead brick
,
10/15/2009 15:05, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] lead brick
,
10/15/2009 15:35, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] lead brick
,
10/15/2009 16:15, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] lead brick
,
10/15/2009 16:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] lead brick
,
10/15/2009 16:46, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] lead brick
,
10/15/2009 17:22, trappe
[Phys-l] Lead Brick
,
10/15/2009 17:35, David Willey
Re: [Phys-l] lead brick
,
10/15/2009 19:44, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Lead Brick
,
10/15/2009 20:06, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] spin ice monopoles?
,
10/15/2009 22:29, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Lead Brick
,
10/16/2009 20:24, physgoff
[Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/17/2009 10:51, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Breaking a wine glass
,
10/17/2009 11:10, John SOHL
Re: [Phys-l] Breaking a wine glass
,
10/17/2009 11:23, curtis osterhoudt
[Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/17/2009 12:45, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/17/2009 13:44, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/17/2009 14:29, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Breaking a wine glass
,
10/17/2009 16:51, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Breaking a wine glass
,
10/18/2009 03:37, David Craig
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 10:51, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 11:00, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 11:42, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 14:41, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Breaking a wine glass
,
10/18/2009 16:07, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 16:07, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 17:09, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 17:24, John Clement
[Phys-l] Arbitrariness of definitions
,
10/18/2009 17:27, Chuck Britton
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 18:01, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Arbitrariness of definitions
,
10/18/2009 18:02, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 18:11, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 18:23, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 18:38, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 19:04, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 19:41, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 20:00, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 20:27, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 22:37, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/18/2009 23:33, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 00:12, Woolf, Lawrence
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 03:18, James McLean
[Phys-l] Holography and Cosmology
,
10/19/2009 09:18, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 09:38, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 09:59, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 10:10, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 10:22, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 11:12, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 12:44, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 12:52, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Unbalanced Electrical Bridge
,
10/19/2009 12:58, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 13:08, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 13:11, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Fwd: [tap-l] Edmund Scientific pushing pseudoscience
,
10/19/2009 13:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 13:40, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 13:57, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Fwd: [tap-l] Edmund Scientific pushing pseudoscience
,
10/19/2009 14:06, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 14:30, John Clement
[Phys-l] College Teaching and the Development of Reasoning
,
10/19/2009 14:53, Calvin Kalman
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 15:03, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 15:21, John Clement
[Phys-l] bladeless fan
,
10/19/2009 15:21, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/19/2009 15:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] bladeless fan
,
10/19/2009 16:19, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Fwd: [narst] FW: Re: Phil Scott talk
,
10/20/2009 09:39, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/20/2009 14:16, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Fwd: [tap-l] Breaking a wine glass
,
10/20/2009 14:51, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Fwd: [tap-l] Breaking a wine glass
,
10/20/2009 14:53, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Orlando workshop on video capture and analysis
,
10/20/2009 17:16, Pat Cooney
Re: [Phys-l] DATA, FACTS, LAWS, THEORIES
,
10/20/2009 20:31, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Herman Daly's Ecological Economist View Contrasted with the Traditional Economist View of Lawrence Summers and the World Bank
,
10/21/2009 19:15, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Innovation and Exponentials (was Herman Daly's Ecological Economist View ...)
,
10/21/2009 19:40, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Innovation and Exponentials (was Herman Daly's Ecological Economist View ...)
,
10/22/2009 00:52, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Fwd: [tap-l] Edmund Scientific pushing pseudoscience
,
10/22/2009 01:14, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
10/22/2009 02:56, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
10/22/2009 09:40, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
10/22/2009 12:09, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
10/22/2009 12:32, John Denker
[Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 13:12, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 13:20, marx
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 13:24, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 13:43, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
10/22/2009 15:19, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 16:28, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 16:53, marx
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 16:56, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 17:48, marx
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 17:51, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 17:58, marx
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 19:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 19:42, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 19:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 20:33, Shapiro, Mark
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 20:37, marx
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 20:45, marx
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 21:29, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 23:10, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 23:13, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/22/2009 23:53, John Clement
[Phys-l] Hawking required to step down; Green steps up.
,
10/23/2009 00:30, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/23/2009 07:48, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global, warming
,
10/23/2009 15:03, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/23/2009 15:38, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global, warming
,
10/23/2009 15:54, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/23/2009 16:02, marx
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/23/2009 16:20, Shapiro, Mark
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/23/2009 16:36, marx
[Phys-l] Physics minor for Biology/Life Science majors
,
10/24/2009 04:10, Joss Ives
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/24/2009 18:57, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/24/2009 22:28, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/24/2009 22:57, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/25/2009 00:13, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/25/2009 12:31, M. Horton
[Phys-l] education web site
,
10/25/2009 21:24, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Fwd: [tap-l] Breaking a wine glass
,
10/26/2009 12:00, bennett bennett
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/26/2009 17:30, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/26/2009 21:19, Price Daniel S.
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/27/2009 09:29, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Poll shows fewer Americans "believe" in global warming
,
10/27/2009 10:42, marx
[Phys-l] use of lgarithms
,
10/28/2009 11:10, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] use of lgarithms
,
10/28/2009 12:31, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] use of lgarithms
,
10/28/2009 13:57, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] use of lgarithms
,
10/28/2009 15:08, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] use of lgarithms
,
10/28/2009 16:29, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] use of lgarithms
,
10/29/2009 07:47, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] history of the internet
,
10/30/2009 05:40, Anthony Lapinski
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc