Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
What risks do I run when I say things like, infra-red light, UV light, X-
ray light? I haven't said "gamma light" yet, but it isn't out of the
question. I've been using these terms for about 5 years.
I work with kids in grades 9-12. At the start of my first crack (grade
9), many think sound & light are the same type of wave (either both are
mechanical, or both are EM waves).
I've been using IR-Light, UV Light etc... and stating that they are the
same thing, just at frequencies outside of our visible range.
Am I causing any damage here?
I understand that is similar to the question that began this thread. I
believe it might be a bit different. I am not asking if this should
become standard notation or if we should be saying UV EM light radiation
waves. Am I abusing folks in some way? I don't want somebody claiming I
am the source of their abuse (dis-abuse?).