Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of January, 2008
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: [Phys-l] Phys-l Digest, Vol 36, Issue 1
,
01/01/2008 14:10, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/01/2008 14:52, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Phys-l Digest, Vol 36, Issue 1
,
01/01/2008 17:22, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Phys-l Digest, Vol 36, Issue 1
,
01/01/2008 17:53, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/01/2008 18:14, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/01/2008 20:18, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/01/2008 21:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/02/2008 00:09, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/02/2008 00:15, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/02/2008 00:53, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-l] signoff-how? (what is the server address?)
,
01/02/2008 09:07, Uri Ganiel
Re: [Phys-l] signoff-how? (what is the server address?)
,
01/02/2008 09:16, Pat Viele
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/02/2008 09:21, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/02/2008 10:32, chuck britton
[Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/02/2008 10:49, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/02/2008 11:03, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/02/2008 11:13, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/02/2008 11:31, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/02/2008 12:14, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/02/2008 12:28, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/02/2008 13:35, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/02/2008 14:01, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/02/2008 15:06, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/02/2008 18:39, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/02/2008 19:52, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/02/2008 22:52, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/02/2008 23:15, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/03/2008 00:13, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-l] Robbie Maddison's Motorcycle jump
,
01/03/2008 13:20, David Abineri
[Phys-l] Robbie Maddison's Motorcycle jump
,
01/03/2008 13:32, David Abineri
Re: [Phys-l] Robbie Maddison's Motorcycle jump
,
01/03/2008 13:39, Matt Coia
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating a disturbance of a stable planetary system.
,
01/03/2008 13:58, William Maddox
[Phys-l] physics of the human body
,
01/04/2008 06:40, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] physics of the human body
,
01/04/2008 07:40, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] physics of the human body
,
01/04/2008 07:56, Vern Lindberg
Re: [Phys-l] physics of the human body
,
01/04/2008 09:11, Monsieur et Madame Vieuxbouc
[Phys-l] Bacteria problem
,
01/04/2008 11:56, Savinainen Antti
Re: [Phys-l] Bacteria problem
,
01/04/2008 12:14, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Bacteria problem
,
01/04/2008 12:21, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Bacteria problem
,
01/04/2008 12:25, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Bacteria problem
,
01/04/2008 12:37, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Bacteria problem
,
01/04/2008 12:45, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/04/2008 13:06, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/04/2008 13:25, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Bacteria problem
,
01/04/2008 13:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] physics of the human body
,
01/04/2008 13:36, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/04/2008 13:41, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Bacteria problem
,
01/04/2008 13:43, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/04/2008 13:53, David Ward
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/04/2008 14:04, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Bacteria problem
,
01/04/2008 14:10, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/04/2008 14:23, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Bacteria problem
,
01/04/2008 14:31, Monsieur et Madame Vieuxbouc
Re: [Phys-l] physics of the human body
,
01/04/2008 14:34, Monsieur et Madame Vieuxbouc
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/04/2008 14:39, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/04/2008 14:51, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/04/2008 15:04, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/04/2008 15:13, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/04/2008 15:22, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Bacteria problem
,
01/04/2008 15:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/04/2008 15:35, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/04/2008 16:27, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/04/2008 19:42, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/04/2008 19:47, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/04/2008 19:51, Michael Porter
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/04/2008 20:12, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/04/2008 20:26, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/04/2008 20:55, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Bacteria problem
,
01/04/2008 21:18, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/05/2008 10:16, Clarence Bennett
Re: [Phys-l] Clarification on Static Electricity
,
01/05/2008 13:41, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/05/2008 13:58, David Ward
[Phys-l] VIRTUAL BLACK HOLES AND PROTON DECAY
,
01/05/2008 14:01, Faraday321
Re: [Phys-l] Bacteria problem
,
01/05/2008 14:31, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/05/2008 14:43, Larry Woolf
Re: [Phys-l] Fun orbital problem
,
01/05/2008 14:45, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/05/2008 15:38, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/05/2008 17:34, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Accelerating automobile
,
01/05/2008 18:03, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Accelerating automobile
,
01/05/2008 18:20, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/05/2008 18:39, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/05/2008 18:48, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/05/2008 21:04, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/05/2008 21:53, Faraday321
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/05/2008 23:27, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/06/2008 00:15, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/06/2008 00:28, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/06/2008 03:16, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/06/2008 03:42, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/06/2008 03:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Accelerating automobile
,
01/06/2008 10:22, John Barrer
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/06/2008 10:46, Michael Porter
Re: [Phys-l] Accelerating automobile
,
01/06/2008 12:46, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Accelerating automobile
,
01/06/2008 12:48, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/06/2008 13:10, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Accelerating automobile
,
01/06/2008 13:38, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/06/2008 14:11, Larry Woolf
Re: [Phys-l] Accelerating automobile
,
01/06/2008 15:20, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/06/2008 16:25, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/06/2008 16:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/06/2008 17:24, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/06/2008 17:45, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/06/2008 18:23, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] g & E fields
,
01/06/2008 21:28, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/06/2008 21:59, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/06/2008 22:06, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/06/2008 22:42, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/07/2008 01:08, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/07/2008 02:02, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] g & E fields
,
01/07/2008 06:07, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back.
,
01/07/2008 07:49, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] g & E fields
,
01/07/2008 07:54, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] g & E fields
,
01/07/2008 09:43, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] g & E fields
,
01/07/2008 10:01, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/07/2008 11:59, Vakil, David
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/07/2008 13:10, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] earth's rotation
,
01/07/2008 14:32, Vakil, David
Re: [Phys-l] lithium batteries
,
01/07/2008 16:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] g & E fields
,
01/07/2008 17:01, William Maddox
[Phys-l] Demonstrated Value of Formative Pre/post Testing
,
01/07/2008 19:23, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] g & E fields
,
01/07/2008 20:21, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Valve technology not dead, yet.
,
01/08/2008 02:02, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Valve technology not dead, yet.
,
01/08/2008 04:15, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] g & E fields
,
01/08/2008 04:43, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/08/2008 18:31, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/08/2008 18:54, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] lithium batteries
,
01/08/2008 22:55, Jeff Radtke
[Phys-l] fizz-ics
,
01/09/2008 10:29, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] fizz-ics
,
01/09/2008 11:57, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] lithium batteries
,
01/09/2008 12:36, John SOHL
Re: [Phys-l] lithium batteries
,
01/09/2008 12:57, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/09/2008 13:23, Robert Cohen
[Phys-l] Physics animations (AVI & Quicktime)
,
01/09/2008 13:45, Yves Pelletier
Re: [Phys-l] Simulating disturbances in a stable planetary system.
,
01/09/2008 14:38, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/09/2008 14:43, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Forwarded Message
,
01/09/2008 16:31, Mark O. Kimball
Re: [Phys-l] fizz-ics
,
01/09/2008 18:42, Bill Nettles
[Phys-l] Fed Resources for Ed Excellence
,
01/09/2008 20:21, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/09/2008 23:29, Laurent Hodges
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/09/2008 23:40, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/09/2008 23:58, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Book Report: The Seashell on the Mountain
,
01/10/2008 00:04, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/10/2008 10:55, Larry Woolf
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/10/2008 11:12, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/10/2008 12:16, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/10/2008 12:52, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/10/2008 13:13, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/10/2008 13:47, Monsieur et Madame Vieuxbouc
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/10/2008 14:33, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/10/2008 14:35, John Denker
[Phys-l] Chalk affects teaching quality.
,
01/10/2008 14:54, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/10/2008 14:58, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/10/2008 15:40, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] rust?
,
01/10/2008 15:47, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Chalk affects teaching quality.
,
01/10/2008 16:03, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] rust?
,
01/10/2008 16:17, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] rust?
,
01/10/2008 16:24, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] rust?
,
01/10/2008 16:27, John Barrer
Re: [Phys-l] rust?
,
01/10/2008 16:33, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/10/2008 17:48, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/10/2008 21:03, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] rust?
,
01/10/2008 21:34, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/11/2008 09:10, Clarence Bennett
Re: [Phys-l] Fed Resources for Ed Excellence
,
01/11/2008 09:56, Pat Viele
[Phys-l] accurate prism dispersion image
,
01/11/2008 11:41, Regan, Tom
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/11/2008 11:47, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] accurate prism dispersion image
,
01/11/2008 12:02, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] Fed Resources for Ed Excellence
,
01/11/2008 12:32, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/11/2008 13:40, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/11/2008 14:40, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/11/2008 16:00, Monsieur et Madame Vieuxbouc
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/11/2008 17:01, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/11/2008 17:39, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/11/2008 18:57, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/11/2008 19:16, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/11/2008 20:22, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/11/2008 21:02, Monsieur et Madame Vieuxbouc
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/11/2008 21:57, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/11/2008 22:15, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/11/2008 22:59, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Chalk affects teaching quality.
,
01/12/2008 00:54, Steve Clark
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/12/2008 01:24, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/12/2008 09:37, FIZIX29
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/12/2008 10:40, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/12/2008 10:51, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/12/2008 11:29, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/12/2008 11:31, Monsieur et Madame Vieuxbouc
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/12/2008 11:43, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/12/2008 12:01, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Robotics course help?
,
01/12/2008 13:13, ovk
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/12/2008 13:53, Monsieur et Madame Vieuxbouc
Re: [Phys-l] Robotics course help?
,
01/12/2008 14:21, Brian Blais
[Phys-l] Can Distance and Classroom Learning Be Increased?
,
01/12/2008 14:40, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/12/2008 15:05, kyle forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/12/2008 15:34, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Robotics course help?
,
01/12/2008 16:51, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Intelligent designists fight back
,
01/12/2008 20:09, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] [ap-physics] Robotics course help?
,
01/12/2008 20:41, Mrs. Joan Drobnak
Re: [Phys-l] Robotics course help?
,
01/12/2008 23:57, Dennis Erickson
[Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/13/2008 10:09, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/13/2008 15:27, fred bucheit
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/13/2008 16:00, John Clement
[Phys-l] A physicist and his background
,
01/13/2008 18:24, Laurent Hodges
Re: [Phys-l] A physicist and his background
,
01/13/2008 18:41, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/13/2008 19:16, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] A physicist and his background
,
01/13/2008 19:21, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] How "Compressive" is Defined.
,
01/15/2008 18:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/15/2008 23:37, James Mackey
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/16/2008 07:59, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/16/2008 09:55, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/16/2008 10:02, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/16/2008 10:18, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/16/2008 11:06, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/16/2008 13:11, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/16/2008 13:58, Alfredo Louro
[Phys-l] Allias effect
,
01/16/2008 17:20, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/16/2008 19:41, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/17/2008 00:43, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/17/2008 01:33, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/17/2008 09:04, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/17/2008 10:54, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/17/2008 12:46, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/17/2008 15:37, FIZIX29
[Phys-l] Energetic Performance of Vehicles; ArchivX Publication?
,
01/17/2008 16:59, Jeff Radtke
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/17/2008 17:06, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/17/2008 17:40, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/17/2008 18:01, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/17/2008 18:25, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/17/2008 21:52, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/17/2008 22:06, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Do Interactive Engagement Methods Yield Long-lived Conceptual Understanding?
,
01/17/2008 23:18, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Are U.S. University Math & Science Departments Partially Responsible for U.S. Students' Relatively Poor Showing on the PISA-2006 Math &
,
01/17/2008 23:28, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/18/2008 14:02, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/18/2008 14:12, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/18/2008 14:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/18/2008 14:26, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/18/2008 14:30, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/18/2008 14:50, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/18/2008 14:56, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/18/2008 15:06, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/18/2008 15:13, Kilmer, Skip
[Phys-l] REname: simulations vs reality
,
01/18/2008 15:24, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/18/2008 15:51, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/18/2008 23:42, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/19/2008 00:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/19/2008 13:19, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/19/2008 14:24, John Clement
[Phys-l] New? Evolution Journal
,
01/19/2008 15:09, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/19/2008 15:28, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] Trigg's Rules of Grammar
,
01/19/2008 17:25, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/19/2008 20:48, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Trigg's Rules of Grammar
,
01/19/2008 21:33, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Trigg's Rules of Grammar
,
01/19/2008 21:46, John Clement
[Phys-l] a side comment on different creationists
,
01/19/2008 22:53, James Braunsdorf
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/19/2008 23:14, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/20/2008 10:15, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/20/2008 11:42, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/20/2008 12:01, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/20/2008 12:28, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical Wrong; shoulda been "The role of simulation".
,
01/20/2008 14:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Trigg's Rules of Grammar
,
01/20/2008 15:06, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] sudden Vacuum freezing
,
01/20/2008 15:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical Wrong; shoulda been "The role of simulation".
,
01/20/2008 15:58, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Trigg's Rules of Grammar
,
01/20/2008 16:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/20/2008 18:23, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/20/2008 22:55, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation
,
01/20/2008 23:07, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] "COLD FUSION"
,
01/21/2008 04:07, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-l] citations (Was Re: the role of simulation)
,
01/21/2008 08:48, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] citations (Was Re: the role of simulation)
,
01/21/2008 13:42, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Energy balance in charging battery
,
01/21/2008 14:32, Savinainen Antti
Re: [Phys-l] citations
,
01/21/2008 14:45, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Energy balance in charging battery
,
01/21/2008 15:39, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Energy balance in charging battery
,
01/21/2008 15:44, Shapiro, Mark
[Phys-l] Rude? Was: Re: citations (Was Re: the role of simulation)
,
01/21/2008 17:40, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical Wrong; shoulda been "The role of simulation".
,
01/21/2008 17:42, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Rude?
,
01/21/2008 18:53, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Rude?
,
01/21/2008 20:34, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Trigg's Rules of Grammar - Challenged
,
01/21/2008 23:52, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Trigg's Rules of Grammar - Challenged
,
01/22/2008 04:51, Anita Pincas
[Phys-l] New gravitational constant
,
01/22/2008 05:22, Savinainen Antti
Re: [Phys-l] New gravitational constant
,
01/22/2008 08:48, Todd Pedlar
Re: [Phys-l] New gravitational constant
,
01/22/2008 10:49, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] New gravitational constant
,
01/22/2008 10:54, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] New gravitational constant
,
01/22/2008 11:11, Todd Pedlar
Re: [Phys-l] New gravitational constant
,
01/22/2008 12:36, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] New gravitational constant
,
01/22/2008 13:52, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Rude? Other mail options
,
01/22/2008 14:09, Ken Fox
Re: [Phys-l] New gravitational constant
,
01/22/2008 14:11, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] New gravitational constant
,
01/22/2008 14:32, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Rude? Other mail options
,
01/22/2008 14:49, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Rude? Other mail options
,
01/22/2008 15:35, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] John's humour. Was: Re: New gravitational constant
,
01/22/2008 18:49, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] New gravitational constant
,
01/22/2008 21:41, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Rude? Other mail options
,
01/22/2008 21:58, Ken Fox
Re: [Phys-l] New gravitational constant
,
01/22/2008 23:08, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] New gravitational constant
,
01/22/2008 23:18, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Citations
,
01/22/2008 23:51, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Citations
,
01/23/2008 00:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] New gravitational constant
,
01/23/2008 01:42, Savinainen Antti
[Phys-l] formatting uncertainties (was: New gravitational constant)
,
01/23/2008 10:23, John Denker
[Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 11:10, Larry Smith
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 11:18, Josh GATES
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 11:42, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties (was: New gravitational constant)
,
01/23/2008 11:47, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 11:47, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 11:50, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 11:58, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 11:59, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/23/2008 12:38, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/23/2008 13:44, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 13:48, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 13:55, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/23/2008 15:04, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/23/2008 15:35, Savinainen Antti
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 16:43, John SOHL
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/23/2008 16:48, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 16:59, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/23/2008 17:07, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 17:17, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/23/2008 17:19, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 17:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 17:42, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 18:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/23/2008 18:32, Michael Porter
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/23/2008 18:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/23/2008 19:02, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 21:29, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/23/2008 21:38, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/24/2008 01:02, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/24/2008 01:20, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/24/2008 09:23, Spagna Jr., George
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/24/2008 10:40, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/24/2008 10:57, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/24/2008 12:49, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/24/2008 14:21, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/24/2008 14:26, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/24/2008 15:06, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/24/2008 16:24, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/24/2008 16:35, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] The attack on science is political, not philosophical
,
01/24/2008 16:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/24/2008 17:04, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/24/2008 17:15, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/24/2008 17:22, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/24/2008 17:24, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/24/2008 17:48, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/24/2008 18:34, John Denker
[Phys-l] Online Education as Institutional Myth
,
01/24/2008 18:39, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/24/2008 20:54, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/24/2008 21:56, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/24/2008 23:04, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/25/2008 01:20, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Grammar
,
01/25/2008 02:33, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Another uncertainties question...
,
01/25/2008 12:38, Jason Alferness
[Phys-l] Practical Physics Site
,
01/25/2008 12:48, Pat Viele
Re: [Phys-l] Another uncertainties question...
,
01/25/2008 12:54, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/25/2008 13:07, Bill Nettles
[Phys-l] online tutorials
,
01/25/2008 13:25, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Another uncertainties question...
,
01/25/2008 13:34, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another uncertainties question...
,
01/25/2008 13:36, Jason Alferness
Re: [Phys-l] online tutorials
,
01/25/2008 13:53, Peter Schoch
Re: [Phys-l] online tutorials
,
01/25/2008 13:56, Pat Viele
Re: [Phys-l] Another uncertainties question...
,
01/25/2008 14:07, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] online tutorials
,
01/25/2008 14:41, Larry Woolf
Re: [Phys-l] Another uncertainties question...
,
01/25/2008 14:58, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] PER Postoc in upper division Quantum Mechanics Course Reform efforts
,
01/25/2008 15:04, Katherine K. Perkins
Re: [Phys-l] Another uncertainties question...
,
01/25/2008 15:07, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] Another uncertainties question...
,
01/25/2008 15:36, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] Another uncertainties question...
,
01/25/2008 15:47, Jason Alferness
Re: [Phys-l] online tutorials
,
01/25/2008 16:03, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Another uncertainties question...
,
01/25/2008 16:30, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] Machining Tolerances (was Another uncertainties question...)
,
01/25/2008 16:44, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-l] Below Detection Limit (was Another uncertainties question...)
,
01/25/2008 17:16, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Machining Tolerances (was Another uncertainties question...)
,
01/25/2008 17:46, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Another uncertainties question...
,
01/26/2008 00:29, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Below Detection Limit (was Another uncertainties question...)
,
01/26/2008 01:18, Jason Alferness
[Phys-l] Bichsel -- black body
,
01/26/2008 01:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Machining Tolerances (was Another uncertainties question...)
,
01/26/2008 03:04, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Below Detection Limit (was Another uncertainties question...)
,
01/26/2008 06:55, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Machining Tolerances (was Another uncertainties question...)
,
01/26/2008 13:08, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] test
,
01/26/2008 16:41, Alberto Meroni
Re: [Phys-l] Machining Tolerances (was Another uncertainties question...)
,
01/26/2008 17:08, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Machining Tolerances (was Another uncertainties question...)
,
01/26/2008 17:32, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] Dynamics Question
,
01/26/2008 20:37, David Abineri
Re: [Phys-l] Dynamics Question
,
01/26/2008 21:02, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] Dynamics Question
,
01/26/2008 22:44, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] formatting uncertainties
,
01/27/2008 01:16, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Machining Tolerances (was Another uncertainties question...)
,
01/27/2008 01:28, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Dynamics Question
,
01/27/2008 01:46, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Energy balance in charging battery
,
01/27/2008 02:01, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] The Production Dilemma
,
01/27/2008 11:44, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] new feature ADS (astrophysics data service)
,
01/28/2008 12:05, Pat Viele
Re: [Phys-l] Below Detection Limit (was Another uncertainties question...)
,
01/28/2008 14:00, Jason Alferness
Re: [Phys-l] pre-to-post tests as measures of learning/teaching
,
01/29/2008 16:08, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Time-travel physicist
,
01/30/2008 17:48, Frederick Lemmerhirt
Re: [Phys-l] Time-travel physicist
,
01/30/2008 18:03, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Time-travel physicist
,
01/30/2008 18:55, Tom Metcalf
Re: [Phys-l] Time-travel physicist
,
01/30/2008 19:50, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Time-travel physicist
,
01/30/2008 22:02, Brian Whatcott
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc