Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
In plan English, I think your nuts. I know local folks who are tryingall
very hard to move the science curriculum in positive ways, and
desperately need funds to do the professional development. Eisenhower
money will do that, but there are so many other pressures on that money
that unless some of it is earmarked for science, it will go away.
cheers
joe
On Sun,
27 Feb 2000, Jim Green wrote:
Yes, phone your senators and tell them that you support block grants and
that the the federal government should keep its nose out of education
betogether. In fact tell them that the Dept of Education should be buried
peacefully in a distant part of the galaxy -- and that your taxes should
couldreduced by the amount given to the DEd.
Jim Green
The new FY2001 proposal has a uncategorized block fund for teacher
professional development written into it, but because of the proposed
removal of the prior Congressional $250 mil stipulation, districts
support.be considered in compliance with just $1 of professional development
.
Jim Green
mailto:JMGreen@sisna.com
http://users.sisna.com/jmgreen