Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of February, 2000
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/01/2000 02:18, William J. Larson
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/01/2000 03:07, Leigh Palmer
Re: roundoff in ?quadrature
,
02/01/2000 06:15, John Denker
experimental analysis
,
02/01/2000 06:17, newboltw
Re: roundoff in ?quadrature
,
02/01/2000 07:52, Richard W. Tarara
Re: roundoff in ?quadrature
,
02/01/2000 08:38, John S. Denker
Re: roundoff in ?quadrature
,
02/01/2000 09:50, Richard W. Tarara
Re: SPRINGS
,
02/01/2000 10:32, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/01/2000 10:51, Richard Bowman
Re: waves vs. diffusion
,
02/01/2000 11:09, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/01/2000 11:22, SSHS KPHOX
Re: SPRINGS
,
02/01/2000 11:28, Tim Folkerts
Re: Fw: more controversy
,
02/01/2000 11:49, Jack Uretsky
Re: SPRINGS
,
02/01/2000 12:23, Thomas Walkiewicz
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/01/2000 12:35, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: experimental analysis
,
02/01/2000 12:38, David T. Marx
Re: SPRINGS
,
02/01/2000 13:17, brian whatcott
Re: waves vs. diffusion
,
02/01/2000 13:30, brian whatcott
Re: SPRINGS
,
02/01/2000 13:38, Daniel Schroeder
FEBRUARY NUMEROLOGY
,
02/01/2000 13:56, Peter Vajk
Re: SPRINGS
,
02/01/2000 14:06, Jim Green
convert light into energy
,
02/01/2000 14:13, Larry Smith
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/01/2000 14:32, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/01/2000 14:52, Joseph Bellina
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/01/2000 15:52, John Mallinckrodt
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/01/2000 21:25, Larry Smith
Re: SPRINGS
,
02/01/2000 22:14, brian whatcott
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 1 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-32)
,
02/01/2000 22:55, Charlie Payne
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/01/2000 23:34, Joseph Bellina
Re: SPRINGS
,
02/01/2000 23:36, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 00:08, Larry Smith
Re: FEBRUARY NUMEROLOGY
,
02/02/2000 05:19, John Cooper
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 06:47, Carr, John
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 06:49, newboltw
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 1 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-32)
,
02/02/2000 08:57, Michael N. Monce
definitions of "linear" (with application to Sig Figures)
,
02/02/2000 09:19, John Denker
Re: FEBRUARY NUMEROLOGY
,
02/02/2000 10:50, David T. Marx
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 11:14, Joseph Bellina
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 11:31, newboltw
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 11:33, Jim Green
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 11:37, newboltw
Re: FEBRUARY NUMEROLOGY
,
02/02/2000 12:17, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 12:27, Robert A Cohen
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 12:31, Jim Green
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 12:55, Carr, John
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 13:14, Leigh Palmer
Re: energy and other things
,
02/02/2000 13:15, John S. Denker
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 13:49, Shawn Knudsen
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 14:07, Chuck Britton
Robert H. Michel Grants
,
02/02/2000 14:13, Warren Hein
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 14:29, John Mallinckrodt
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 15:07, Leigh Palmer
Re: definitions of "linear" (with application to Sig Figures)
,
02/02/2000 15:31, Jack Uretsky
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 15:34, Jack Uretsky
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 15:42, Jack Uretsky
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 15:48, Tim Folkerts
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 16:24, Jim Green
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 16:38, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 16:39, Jim Green
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 16:41, Jim Green
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 16:54, Chuck Britton
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 16:59, Shawn Knudsen
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 17:14, Leigh Palmer
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 17:28, Jim Green
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 17:32, Jim Green
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 17:41, Jim Green
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 18:51, John Carr
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 19:15, Chuck Britton
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 19:26, Chuck Britton
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 19:34, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Sig Figures and tides
,
02/02/2000 19:47, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 19:51, Leigh Palmer
Re: Sig Figures and tides
,
02/02/2000 19:59, Leigh Palmer
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 20:31, John Mallinckrodt
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 20:48, Jack Uretsky
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/02/2000 20:57, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Sig Figures and tides
,
02/02/2000 21:18, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/02/2000 22:30, Ludwik Kowalski
Temporary physics teaching position available at UC Santa Barbara
,
02/03/2000 00:35, Roger Freedman
sig. fig. etc.
,
02/03/2000 03:33, newboltw
Re: Sig Figures and tides
,
02/03/2000 07:18, David Bowman
Re: Sig Figures and tides
,
02/03/2000 07:59, brian whatcott
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/03/2000 08:15, brian whatcott
Re: non-relative angular velocity
,
02/03/2000 08:18, John Denker
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/03/2000 08:19, Joseph Bellina
Re: Sig Figures
,
02/03/2000 08:40, John S. Denker
Re: energy is only an attribute
,
02/03/2000 09:35, Richard W. Tarara
Re: non-relative angular velocity
,
02/03/2000 09:45, Chuck Britton
Re: energy is only an attribute
,
02/03/2000 09:48, Chuck Britton
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/03/2000 10:11, Joseph Bellina
A pleasure to read
,
02/03/2000 10:21, Joseph Bellina
Re: convert light into energy
,
02/03/2000 10:42, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Sig Figures and tides
,
02/03/2000 10:49, Leigh Palmer
Re: non-relative angular velocity
,
02/03/2000 11:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Survey for SAT II Physics
,
02/03/2000 11:19, Zolandz, Ann Marie
Re: Sig Figures and tides
,
02/03/2000 11:42, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: non-relative angular velocity
,
02/03/2000 12:23, David Bowman
sig digs versus signals extracted from noise
,
02/03/2000 12:25, John S. Denker
definition of physics
,
02/03/2000 12:54, Larry Smith
Re: definition of physics
,
02/03/2000 13:20, Leigh Palmer
Re: definition of physics
,
02/03/2000 16:00, Rondo Jeffery
Re: non-relative angular velocity
,
02/03/2000 16:07, Herbert H Gottlieb
A rotating Earth?
,
02/03/2000 16:13, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A rotating Earth?
,
02/03/2000 16:41, Joseph Bellina
Hot water in microwave
,
02/03/2000 16:56, Rick Swanson
Re: A rotating Earth?
,
02/03/2000 17:03, Daniel Schroeder
Re: A rotating Earth
,
02/03/2000 17:06, John S. Denker
Re: Hot water in microwave
,
02/03/2000 17:13, Tom McCarthy
Poynting vector energy transport
,
02/03/2000 17:15, Chuck Britton
Re: superheated water
,
02/03/2000 17:18, John S. Denker
Re: definition of physics
,
02/03/2000 17:28, Tom Ford
Re: A rotating Earth?
,
02/03/2000 17:44, Rick Strickert
Road Scholar
,
02/03/2000 17:45, P. O. Johnson
Re: superheated water
,
02/03/2000 17:58, Michael Edmiston
Re: Hot water in microwave
,
02/03/2000 17:59, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Poynting vector energy transport
,
02/03/2000 18:20, Leigh Palmer
Re: Hot water in microwave
,
02/03/2000 18:22, David Kardelis
Re: A rotating Earth?
,
02/03/2000 18:27, Leigh Palmer
Re: superheated water
,
02/03/2000 18:27, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Hot water in microwave
,
02/03/2000 18:31, Richard Bowman
Re: A rotating Earth?
,
02/03/2000 18:33, Joseph Bellina
Re: A rotating Earth?
,
02/03/2000 18:38, Joseph Bellina
Re: superheated water
,
02/03/2000 18:45, William Beaty
Re: superheated water
,
02/03/2000 19:07, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: A rotating Earth?
,
02/03/2000 19:35, John Mallinckrodt
Re: energy is only an attribute
,
02/03/2000 19:39, William Beaty
Re: superheated water
,
02/03/2000 19:53, William Beaty
Re: A rotating Earth?
,
02/03/2000 19:56, Joseph Bellina
Re: superheated water
,
02/04/2000 03:27, newboltw
Re: A rotating Earth?
,
02/04/2000 04:21, Digby Willard
Re: Survey for SAT II Physics
,
02/04/2000 07:33, Moore, David
Re: Survey for SAT II Physics
,
02/04/2000 08:04, Keith Tipton
Re: Hot water in microwave
,
02/04/2000 08:50, Rick Swanson
Re: superheated water
,
02/04/2000 09:22, John S. Denker
Re: A rotating Earth?
,
02/04/2000 09:41, Digby Willard
Re: superheated water
,
02/04/2000 09:48, Michael Edmiston
Re: A rotating Earth?
,
02/04/2000 10:48, Joseph Bellina
Re: A rotating Earth?
,
02/04/2000 15:23, Gary Karshner
Special Relativity Question
,
02/04/2000 15:55, Abul Kalam
Re: A rotating Earth?
,
02/04/2000 16:01, Joseph Bellina
Teacher Award (fwd)
,
02/04/2000 16:10, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Special Relativity Question
,
02/04/2000 16:28, Chuck Britton
Re: Special Relativity Question
,
02/04/2000 16:51, John Mallinckrodt
No stiffness effect
,
02/04/2000 17:35, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: superheated water
,
02/04/2000 17:38, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Special Relativity Question
,
02/04/2000 17:39, David Bowman
Re: A rotating Earth?
,
02/04/2000 19:42, brian whatcott
Re: Special Relativity Question
,
02/04/2000 19:43, Leigh Palmer
Entropy
,
02/04/2000 22:04, Chuck Britton
Re: Entropy
,
02/04/2000 23:26, John Denker
Re: Entropy (very long)
,
02/05/2000 08:23, David Bowman
R: Special Relativity Question
,
02/05/2000 08:31, Paolo Cavallo
Re: Entropy (was very long)
,
02/05/2000 11:05, John Denker
Re: Entropy
,
02/05/2000 11:16, Leigh Palmer
Re: Entropy /correction/
,
02/05/2000 11:30, John Denker
Re: Hot water in microwave
,
02/05/2000 11:42, Hugh Haskell
Re: Hot water in microwave
,
02/05/2000 12:40, Larry Cartwright
Re: Entropy (was very long)
,
02/05/2000 13:00, David Bowman
Re: Entropy /correction/
,
02/05/2000 13:42, David Bowman
Re: Entropy /correction/
,
02/05/2000 14:32, John Denker
Members' Webpage Directory
,
02/05/2000 16:36, Larry Cartwright
Re: Hot water in microwave
,
02/05/2000 17:40, William Beaty
Re: Hot water in microwave
,
02/05/2000 19:29, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Hot water in microwave
,
02/05/2000 22:15, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: No stiffness effect
,
02/06/2000 10:53, Ludwik Kowalski
MS Eq. Ed. ques.
,
02/06/2000 14:38, Leon Leonardo
Re: MS Eq. Ed. ques.
,
02/06/2000 17:41, Rick Tarara
Wonderfest 2000: Internet Festival of Science
,
02/06/2000 19:04, Tucker Hiatt
Microwave boiling water
,
02/06/2000 20:32, E.C. Muehleisen
Re: MS Eq. Ed. ques.
,
02/06/2000 21:45, Jack Uretsky
[Fwd: Microwave boiling water]
,
02/06/2000 22:15, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: MS Eq. Ed. ques.
,
02/06/2000 23:45, Jerome Epstein
Re: MS Eq. Ed. ques.problem found
,
02/07/2000 03:06, Leon Leonardo
Re: MS Eq. Ed. ques.
,
02/07/2000 12:15, Jack Uretsky
Re: MS Eq. Ed. ques.
,
02/07/2000 12:38, Richard W. Tarara
Re: [Fwd: Microwave boiling water]
,
02/07/2000 15:37, Tim Folkerts
Re: possible stiffness effect
,
02/07/2000 16:57, John Denker
Re: No stiffness effect?
,
02/07/2000 17:38, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Fwd: Microwave boiling water]
,
02/07/2000 17:45, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Curriculum Coverage
,
02/07/2000 17:54, John Carr
AJP and Mac Programmer
,
02/07/2000 18:58, David Vernier
Re: AJP and Mac Programmer
,
02/07/2000 19:18, Rick Strickert
Re: No stiffness effect?
,
02/07/2000 21:10, brian whatcott
Re: possible stiffness effect
,
02/07/2000 21:12, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Curriculum Coverage
,
02/08/2000 00:55, Hugh Haskell
metal conductivity (fwd)
,
02/08/2000 05:44, John Cooper
Re: metal conductivity (fwd)
,
02/08/2000 09:49, Leigh Palmer
Re: metal conductivity (fwd)
,
02/08/2000 09:59, David Bowman
Re: metal conductivity (fwd)
,
02/08/2000 11:30, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: metal conductivity (fwd)
,
02/08/2000 12:54, brian whatcott
AAPT Update 2000 Number 1 (fwd)
,
02/08/2000 16:46, Daniel L. MacIsaac
astroed-l international listserver
,
02/09/2000 08:27, Margaret Mazzolini
Re: Entropy (was very long) ERRATUM
,
02/09/2000 15:24, David Bowman
entropy with quenched disorder
,
02/09/2000 15:38, David Bowman
Entropy
,
02/09/2000 16:00, Leigh Palmer
refractive index of solutions
,
02/09/2000 16:30, David T. Marx
Re: Entropy
,
02/09/2000 16:58, Chuck Britton
Re: Entropy
,
02/09/2000 17:16, Leigh Palmer
Re: refractive index of solutions
,
02/09/2000 19:03, brian whatcott
Re: Entropy
,
02/09/2000 19:13, David Bowman
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/09/2000 20:29, John Denker
Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/09/2000 21:29, Larry Cartwright
Re: Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/10/2000 09:59, Jack Uretsky
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/10/2000 10:37, Leigh Palmer
Re: Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/10/2000 10:40, Leigh Palmer
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/10/2000 11:14, John Denker
Re: metal conductivity
,
02/10/2000 11:28, John Denker
Re: seti@home
,
02/10/2000 12:18, P. O. Johnson
Re: Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/10/2000 13:13, Ludwik Kowalski
Newton's 2nd Law problem
,
02/10/2000 13:31, romanza
Re: Newton's 2nd Law problem
,
02/10/2000 14:03, Leigh Palmer
Re: Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/10/2000 16:20, Chuck Britton
Re: Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/10/2000 16:34, Paul Zitzewitz
Re: Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/10/2000 17:02, Chuck Britton
Re: Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/10/2000 17:49, Cliff Parker
Re: metal conductivity (fwd)
,
02/10/2000 19:21, brian whatcott
Re: Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/10/2000 19:59, Samuel Held
Re: Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/10/2000 22:35, Larry Cartwright
Re: Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/11/2000 00:26, Jack Uretsky
Re: Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/11/2000 00:35, Brian McInnes
Re: Newton's 2nd Law problem
,
02/11/2000 06:09, Eugene P. Mosca
Newton's 2nd Law problem
,
02/11/2000 08:21, romanza
Newton's 2nd Law problem (resent)
,
02/11/2000 08:25, romanza
Re: Newton's 2nd Law problem
,
02/11/2000 09:26, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/11/2000 09:44, David Bowman
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/11/2000 10:02, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Newton's 2nd Law problem
,
02/11/2000 10:14, Kirkpatrick, James
physics love letter
,
02/11/2000 10:49, Wilson Gonzalez-espada
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/11/2000 10:54, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/11/2000 11:16, Joel Rauber
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/11/2000 12:07, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/11/2000 12:30, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/11/2000 12:38, David Bowman
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/11/2000 12:47, David Bowman
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/11/2000 13:01, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/11/2000 13:04, David Bowman
Re: Newton's 2nd Law problem
,
02/11/2000 13:12, brian whatcott
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/11/2000 13:18, David Bowman
Re: Entropy: quenched disorder is entropy
,
02/11/2000 13:40, Leigh Palmer
Re: Entropy: sorted=0 unsorted=237
,
02/11/2000 16:14, John S. Denker
Re: Entropy: sorted=0 unsorted=237
,
02/11/2000 17:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: Entropy: sorted=0 unsorted=237
,
02/11/2000 17:34, Jim Green
Re: Entropy: sorted=0 unsorted=237
,
02/11/2000 17:48, Leigh Palmer
Re: Entropy: sorted=0 unsorted=237
,
02/11/2000 18:02, Andy Piacsek
Re: Entropy
,
02/11/2000 18:21, Leigh Palmer
Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs
,
02/11/2000 19:17, Chuck Britton
Re: Entropy (error)
,
02/11/2000 20:26, Leigh Palmer
Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs
,
02/11/2000 20:54, Leigh Palmer
Re: Entropy: sorted=0 unsorted=237
,
02/11/2000 22:18, Jim Green
Re: Entropy: sorted=0 unsorted=237
,
02/12/2000 01:02, John Denker
Re: Entropy (error)
,
02/12/2000 01:15, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs
,
02/12/2000 02:21, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Entropy (statistical +- thermal)
,
02/12/2000 07:26, John Denker
Re: Entropy: sorted=0 unsorted=237
,
02/12/2000 07:46, John Denker
Re: Entropy -- sorted -- side bar
,
02/12/2000 13:12, Jim Green
Re: Entropy: sorted=0 unsorted=237
,
02/12/2000 15:33, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
friction
,
02/12/2000 15:44, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: friction
,
02/12/2000 16:05, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs
,
02/12/2000 16:42, Mark Sylvester
Re: Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs
,
02/12/2000 16:54, Shapiro, Mark
Off Topic Re: friction
,
02/12/2000 17:12, brian whatcott
Re: Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs
,
02/12/2000 17:50, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
will pay $80 for 1st or 2nd edition PSSC
,
02/12/2000 17:51, Ben Crowell
Re: friction
,
02/12/2000 18:35, Cliff Parker
burning my breeches
,
02/12/2000 19:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: friction
,
02/12/2000 19:37, Leigh Palmer
Re: burning my breeches
,
02/12/2000 19:49, Leigh Palmer
Re: friction
,
02/12/2000 20:52, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: friction
,
02/12/2000 23:09, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Off Topic Re: friction
,
02/12/2000 23:14, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: friction
,
02/12/2000 23:49, Jim Green
Re: Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs
,
02/12/2000 23:54, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Appeal to poster
,
02/13/2000 00:18, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/13/2000 01:14, Larry Cartwright
R: Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/13/2000 04:03, Paolo Cavallo
Re: Newton's 2nd Law problem (resent)
,
02/13/2000 10:46, Leigh Palmer
Re: friction
,
02/13/2000 12:33, Leigh Palmer
Re: Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs
,
02/13/2000 21:43, Zach Wolff
Re: Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs
,
02/13/2000 22:25, Jack Uretsky
Re: language (was Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs)
,
02/13/2000 22:48, Brian McInnes
Re: Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs
,
02/13/2000 23:01, Chuck Britton
Re: Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs
,
02/14/2000 01:43, Larry Cartwright
Re: Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs
,
02/14/2000 03:43, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: language (was Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs)
,
02/14/2000 05:58, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: imported vocabulary
,
02/14/2000 06:54, John Denker
Re: imported vocabulary
,
02/14/2000 07:16, Chuck Britton
Re: language (was Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs)
,
02/14/2000 09:21, Michael Edmiston
Re: Friction
,
02/14/2000 09:41, Robert Morse
The Grammar and Spelling list--formerly Phys-L
,
02/14/2000 09:46, Richard W. Tarara
Re: The Grammar and Spelling list--formerly Phys-L
,
02/14/2000 09:51, Leigh Palmer
Re: The Grammar and Spelling list--formerly Phys-L
,
02/14/2000 10:04, Richard W. Tarara
Re: language (was Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs)
,
02/14/2000 10:10, Clarence Bennett
Re: The Grammar and Spelling list--formerly Phys-L
,
02/14/2000 10:27, Leigh Palmer
Re: The Grammar and Spelling list--formerly Phys-L
,
02/14/2000 10:53, Bob Sciamanda
Re: language (was Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs)
,
02/14/2000 11:00, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: language (was Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs)
,
02/14/2000 11:20, Joel Rauber
Re: Appeal to poster
,
02/14/2000 11:28, Joel Rauber
Funding for NSF Education Programs
,
02/14/2000 12:01, Warren Hein
Re: language (was Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs)
,
02/14/2000 12:01, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: language (was Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs)
,
02/14/2000 13:19, Spagna Jr., George
Modeling Workshops this summer
,
02/14/2000 13:25, Jane Jackson
Re: Funding for NSF Education Programs
,
02/14/2000 14:15, David Emigh
Re: Reaching toward the Big Bang
,
02/14/2000 14:54, Jack Uretsky
Re: Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs
,
02/14/2000 15:48, P. O. Johnson
webassign
,
02/14/2000 16:03, Crook
A+ manual
,
02/14/2000 16:19, Charlie Goodspeed
Re: webassign
,
02/14/2000 17:16, Andy Dougherty
Re: webassign
,
02/14/2000 22:13, Hugh Haskell
Re: off topic: language, long
,
02/15/2000 00:54, Zach Wolff
alternatives to Halliday?
,
02/15/2000 01:18, Ben Crowell
Re: off topic: language, long
,
02/15/2000 01:20, Richard Grandy
Re: alternatives to Halliday?
,
02/15/2000 02:59, Mojca Cepic
Re: alternatives to Halliday?
,
02/15/2000 06:56, John Gastineau
Language
,
02/15/2000 07:32, Kirkpatrick, James
Re: off topic: language, long
,
02/15/2000 07:35, Kirkpatrick, James
Re: off topic: language, long
,
02/15/2000 08:05, brian whatcott
Re: imported vocabulary
,
02/15/2000 08:12, Wilson Gonzalez-espada
Re: alternatives to Halliday?
,
02/15/2000 08:55, Don Boys
Re: alternatives to Halliday?
,
02/15/2000 09:18, Joseph Bellina
Re: off topic: language, long
,
02/15/2000 09:38, Richard W. Tarara
Grant
,
02/15/2000 10:36, James Harris
Re: alternatives to Halliday?
,
02/15/2000 10:54, Robert J. Beichner
Re: alternatives to Halliday?
,
02/15/2000 13:13, Larry Smith
Digital video cameras and camcorders
,
02/15/2000 13:34, Timothy S. Sullivan
Re: off topic: language, long
,
02/15/2000 14:21, Zach Wolff
PER?
,
02/15/2000 14:50, SSHS KPHOX
Re: off topic: language, long
,
02/15/2000 15:03, Bob Sciamanda
Re: PER?
,
02/15/2000 15:16, Chuck Britton
Re: PER?
,
02/15/2000 16:42, Keith Tipton
Re: alternatives to Halliday?
,
02/15/2000 16:59, David Ward
TIR in periscopes
,
02/16/2000 02:33, Digby Willard
Re: WebAssign
,
02/16/2000 02:59, Roger Freedman
Re: alternatives to Halliday?
,
02/16/2000 08:04, Cindy Schwarz
IBM Research Award for Undergraduate Women
,
02/16/2000 08:11, Warren Hein
Library Access, Benefactors and the Censor
,
02/16/2000 08:12, brian whatcott
Re: TIR in periscopes
,
02/16/2000 09:12, Steven T. Ratliff
Re: TIR in periscopes
,
02/16/2000 09:15, Digby Willard
Re: TIR in periscopes
,
02/16/2000 09:24, Michael Edmiston
Re: TIR in periscopes - error correction
,
02/16/2000 09:57, Michael Edmiston
Re: TIR in periscopes
,
02/16/2000 10:14, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: off topic: language, long
,
02/16/2000 10:33, Digby Willard
Re: alternatives to Halliday?
,
02/16/2000 10:52, Joseph Bellina
Question
,
02/16/2000 19:41, Robert Carlson
Re: Question
,
02/16/2000 20:03, Leaf Turner
Re: will pay $80 for 1st or 2nd edition PSSC
,
02/16/2000 20:21, SSHS KPHOX
Re: will pay $80 for 1st or 2nd edition PSSC
,
02/16/2000 20:41, brian whatcott
Re: Question about Eskimo Igloos
,
02/16/2000 20:45, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Entropy (long answer to Leigh)
,
02/16/2000 21:04, David Bowman
Re: Question about Eskimo Igloos
,
02/16/2000 22:27, Larry Cartwright
Networking guide for PhD students
,
02/16/2000 22:31, Larry Cartwright
Oops, sorry!
,
02/16/2000 22:47, Larry Cartwright
Re: Question
,
02/17/2000 10:26, Laurent Hodges
Re: Question
,
02/17/2000 10:56, Greg Clements
Re: Road Scholar
,
02/17/2000 12:10, Doug Craigen
Re: Grant
,
02/17/2000 12:57, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: alternatives to Halliday?
,
02/17/2000 17:01, Robert A Cohen
Just what is a particle?
,
02/17/2000 18:29, Cliff Parker
Re: Just what is a particle?
,
02/17/2000 19:27, Jack Uretsky
Re: Just what is a particle?
,
02/17/2000 20:24, Hugh Haskell
Re: Just what is a particle?
,
02/17/2000 20:32, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Just what is a particle?
,
02/17/2000 21:18, John Denker
Re: Just what is a particle?
,
02/17/2000 22:23, William Beaty
Re: Just what is a particle?
,
02/17/2000 22:39, Cliff Parker
Re: Just what is a particle?
,
02/17/2000 22:56, William Beaty
Re: will pay $80 for 1st or 2nd edition PSSC
,
02/17/2000 23:11, Larry Cartwright
Re: will pay $80 for 1st or 2nd edition PSSC
,
02/18/2000 00:12, Keith Tipton
Re: alternatives to Halliday
,
02/18/2000 08:05, Robert J. Beichner
Re: photons, restmass, relmass
,
02/18/2000 09:06, John Denker
Re: Just what is a particle?
,
02/18/2000 09:55, David Bowman
Re: Just what is a particle?
,
02/18/2000 11:00, Hugh Haskell
Re: alternatives to Halliday
,
02/18/2000 11:09, Joel Rauber
Textbook alternatives
,
02/18/2000 11:36, Laurent Hodges
Re: Textbook alternatives
,
02/18/2000 12:20, Peter Schoch
please don't post to the list about selling PSSC
,
02/18/2000 12:41, Ben Crowell
alternatives to Halliday?
,
02/18/2000 13:07, Ben Crowell
Re: Just what is a particle?
,
02/18/2000 14:16, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Textbook alternatives
,
02/18/2000 16:09, Herbert H Gottlieb
Particle? -- Mass?
,
02/18/2000 17:10, Jim Green
Re: Just what is a particle?
,
02/18/2000 18:38, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Just what is a particle?
,
02/18/2000 20:21, Jack Uretsky
Re: Just what is a particle?
,
02/18/2000 20:28, Jack Uretsky
WIMP=big big neutrino?
,
02/19/2000 11:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Advanced Lab Topics
,
02/19/2000 11:53, David Ward
Re: WIMP=big big neutrino?
,
02/19/2000 12:52, Jack Uretsky
Copernican Revolution
,
02/19/2000 15:14, Larry Smith
Re: Copernican Revolution
,
02/19/2000 16:22, Gary Karshner
Re: Copernican Revolution
,
02/19/2000 16:37, djhamil@teleport.com
Re: Copernican Revolution
,
02/19/2000 17:01, brian whatcott
Sun's distance
,
02/19/2000 17:16, fred brace
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/19/2000 17:27, Richard Grandy
Re: Copernican Revolution
,
02/19/2000 17:31, Richard Grandy
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/19/2000 17:38, Jack Uretsky
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/19/2000 19:03, brian whatcott
Re: WIMP=big big neutrino?
,
02/19/2000 20:06, brian whatcott
Re: language (was Quartz/Halogen incandescent bulbs)
,
02/19/2000 22:57, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: The Grammar and Spelling list--formerly Phys-L
,
02/19/2000 23:21, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
physics/technology ideas for Kenya student?
,
02/19/2000 23:37, Jane Jackson
Chabay and Sherwood
,
02/20/2000 11:51, Ben Crowell
Re: WIMP=big big neutrino?
,
02/20/2000 11:58, Jack Uretsky
Re: Copernican Revolution
,
02/20/2000 13:57, Joseph Bellina
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/20/2000 19:00, Peter Vajk
Re: Textbook alternatives
,
02/21/2000 11:48, frank cange
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/21/2000 12:15, fred brace
Re: photons, restmass, relmass
,
02/21/2000 12:55, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/21/2000 13:02, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/21/2000 13:19, brian whatcott
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/21/2000 13:58, Gary Karshner
MARCH TPT
,
02/21/2000 15:43, Richard W. Tarara
PER Postdoc at MSU
,
02/21/2000 16:44, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/21/2000 18:42, Leigh Palmer
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/21/2000 23:17, William J. Larson
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/22/2000 03:16, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/22/2000 09:32, Gary Karshner
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/22/2000 09:55, Leigh Palmer
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/22/2000 10:23, Barlow Newbolt
What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/22/2000 11:45, Laurent Hodges
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/22/2000 13:28, Jim Green
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/22/2000 15:43, Barlow Newbolt
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/22/2000 16:21, Joel Rauber
Re Sun's Distance -- Foot note
,
02/22/2000 16:23, Jim Green
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/22/2000 16:45, Hugh Haskell
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/22/2000 17:46, Mark Sylvester
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/22/2000 18:10, Zach Wolff
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/22/2000 18:32, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/22/2000 18:37, Leigh Palmer
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/22/2000 18:41, Jim Green
What Einstein Hath Writ.
,
02/22/2000 18:52, brian whatcott
Re: Sun's distance
,
02/22/2000 19:28, Peter Vajk
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/22/2000 20:36, Ludwik Kowalski
Sun's distance (2)
,
02/22/2000 22:12, fred brace
Re: Sun's distance (2)
,
02/22/2000 22:25, Leigh Palmer
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/22/2000 23:31, Hugh Haskell
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/22/2000 23:36, Hugh Haskell
Re: Sun's distance (2)
,
02/22/2000 23:46, Hugh Haskell
Re: Sun's distance (2)
,
02/23/2000 00:26, brian whatcott
algebra-based textbooks
,
02/23/2000 08:49, Wolfgang Rueckner
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/23/2000 10:41, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: algebra-based textbooks
,
02/23/2000 10:51, Peter Schoch
Re: Textbook alternatives
,
02/23/2000 11:39, Lemmerhirt, Fred
Re: What hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/23/2000 11:52, Daniel L. MacIsaac
sun's distance as lab exercise?
,
02/23/2000 12:47, David Strasburger-fac
Re: sun's distance as lab exercise?
,
02/23/2000 13:11, Mel Bartels
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/23/2000 13:41, John Howell
Re: sun's distance as lab exercise?
,
02/23/2000 14:06, Robert A Cohen
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/23/2000 14:10, Jim Green
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/23/2000 14:16, Jim Green
Re: What Hath Einstein Writ?
,
02/23/2000 14:21, Chuck Britton
Re: Textbook alternatives
,
02/23/2000 14:58, Joseph Bellina
long jumping
,
02/23/2000 15:07, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Textbook alternatives
,
02/23/2000 15:37, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Sun's distance (2)
,
02/23/2000 15:59, Gary Karshner
Relativistic mass
,
02/23/2000 16:30, THOMAS SANDIN
Re: sun's distance as lab exercise?
,
02/23/2000 17:41, Leigh Palmer
Re: sun's distance as lab exercise?
,
02/23/2000 17:48, Leigh Palmer
Re: sun's distance as lab exercise?
,
02/23/2000 18:00, Leigh Palmer
Re: Textbook alternatives
,
02/23/2000 18:40, Leigh Palmer
Re: Sun's distance (2)
,
02/23/2000 20:24, Leigh Palmer
Re: Relativistic mass
,
02/23/2000 20:31, David Bowman
Re: sun's distance as lab exercise?
,
02/23/2000 21:36, brian whatcott
Re: Textbook alternatives
,
02/24/2000 08:06, Joseph Bellina
The Cavendish experiment
,
02/24/2000 10:32, Laurent Hodges
Re: The Cavendish experiment
,
02/24/2000 10:37, Joseph Bellina
Re: The Cavendish experiment
,
02/24/2000 12:03, Leigh Palmer
Re: The Cavendish experiment
,
02/24/2000 12:53, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Relativistic mass
,
02/24/2000 13:26, THOMAS SANDIN
Re: long jumping
,
02/24/2000 13:29, Bob Sciamanda
algebra-based textbooks
,
02/24/2000 18:06, Ben Crowell
sound pressure display and fft
,
02/24/2000 18:31, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: The Cavendish experiment
,
02/24/2000 19:09, brian whatcott
Re: The Cavendish experiment
,
02/24/2000 19:51, Jack Uretsky
Re: sun's distance as lab exercise?
,
02/25/2000 10:19, David Strasburger-fac
typesetting math and physics
,
02/25/2000 13:58, Larry Smith
Re: typesetting math and physics
,
02/25/2000 14:23, Daniel Schroeder
PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/25/2000 18:29, Ludwik Kowalski
Is computer science pseudo-science?
,
02/25/2000 18:35, Daniel Schroeder
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/25/2000 19:24, Rick Tarara
Re: long jumping
,
02/25/2000 19:32, Carl E. Mungan
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/25/2000 22:43, John Denker
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/26/2000 07:54, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/26/2000 08:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/26/2000 08:29, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/26/2000 08:38, Jack Uretsky
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/26/2000 11:31, Doug Craigen
Re: long jumping
,
02/26/2000 12:14, Bob Sciamanda
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/26/2000 20:58, Leigh Palmer
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/27/2000 08:20, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/27/2000 08:25, Chuck Britton
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/27/2000 08:48, Robert W. Harris
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/27/2000 09:33, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/27/2000 10:00, Shapiro, Mark
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/27/2000 10:24, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/27/2000 10:25, P. O. Johnson
Re: sound pressure display and fft
,
02/27/2000 10:42, Chuck Britton
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/27/2000 10:49, brian whatcott
Re: sound pressure display and fft
,
02/27/2000 10:50, Chuck Britton
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/27/2000 10:56, Chuck Britton
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/27/2000 10:56, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/27/2000 11:18, brian whatcott
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/27/2000 14:11, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 26 Feb 2000 to 27 Feb 2000 (#2000-64)
,
02/27/2000 14:55, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/27/2000 15:33, Bob Sciamanda
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/27/2000 15:49, Leigh Palmer
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/27/2000 16:00, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 26 Feb 2000 to 27 Feb 2000 (#2000-64)
,
02/27/2000 16:05, Jack Uretsky
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/27/2000 16:06, Bob Sciamanda
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/27/2000 16:37, Bob Sciamanda
Re: scientific method(s)
,
02/27/2000 17:05, John Denker
[no subject]
,
02/27/2000 19:18, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: scientific method(s), was PSEDO-SCIENCE
,
02/27/2000 20:39, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: scientific method(s), was PSEDO-SCIENCE
,
02/27/2000 20:57, Chuck Britton
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/27/2000 22:31, brian whatcott
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 27 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-65)
,
02/27/2000 22:34, Dorrie Bright
Re: Education
,
02/27/2000 22:53, Jim Green
Re: Education
,
02/27/2000 23:19, Hugh Haskell
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/27/2000 23:56, Doug Craigen
Re: scientific method
,
02/28/2000 00:14, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/28/2000 02:34, Leigh Palmer
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE
,
02/28/2000 03:29, S.Goelzer
Re: relativistic mass
,
02/28/2000 08:46, Barlow Newbolt
Re: relativistic mass
,
02/28/2000 08:49, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Education
,
02/28/2000 08:56, Joseph Bellina
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/28/2000 09:05, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE
,
02/28/2000 09:32, Leigh Palmer
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/28/2000 10:10, Michael Edmiston
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/28/2000 10:46, Doug Craigen
Word processor for math and physics
,
02/28/2000 10:54, Laurent Hodges
Re: scientific method
,
02/28/2000 11:17, kyle forinash
Re: Education
,
02/28/2000 12:09, Jim Green
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/28/2000 12:14, Joel Rauber
Re: Education
,
02/28/2000 12:20, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Education
,
02/28/2000 12:36, Jane Jackson
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/28/2000 14:45, Zach Wolff
Re: Education
,
02/28/2000 14:53, Jim Green
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/28/2000 15:05, Richard W. Tarara
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/28/2000 15:09, Zach Wolff
On Galileo
,
02/28/2000 17:12, Joseph Bellina
Re: Education
,
02/28/2000 17:52, Shapiro, Mark
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE
,
02/28/2000 18:03, Greg Kifer
Re: Education
,
02/28/2000 18:04, Jerome Epstein
Re: Education
,
02/28/2000 18:31, Jim Green
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE
,
02/28/2000 18:43, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE
,
02/28/2000 22:32, Greg Kifer
Re: Education
,
02/28/2000 23:04, Hugh Haskell
The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 06:13, Eugene P. Mosca
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE
,
02/29/2000 07:14, Greg Kifer
Re: The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 08:05, Joseph Bellina
How well I remember 1600
,
02/29/2000 08:07, Joseph Bellina
Re: The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 08:43, Barlow Newbolt
Re: The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 09:01, John Mallinckrodt
Re: The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 09:05, Peter Schoch
Re: The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 09:09, John Mallinckrodt
Re: The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 09:34, Michael Edmiston
freshman physics (fwd)
,
02/29/2000 09:43, Joseph Bellina
Re: The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 09:44, Leigh Palmer
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/29/2000 09:49, Barlow Newbolt
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE
,
02/29/2000 10:26, Robert A Cohen
Re: freshman physics (fwd)
,
02/29/2000 10:49, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-68)
,
02/29/2000 11:08, David Ward
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE
,
02/29/2000 11:22, Jack Uretsky
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-68)
,
02/29/2000 11:27, Richard W. Tarara
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/29/2000 11:30, Jack Uretsky
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE
,
02/29/2000 11:33, Jack Uretsky
Re: Teaching to the test
,
02/29/2000 11:46, Digby Willard
"Nature abhors a vacuum"
,
02/29/2000 11:49, Digby Willard
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE
,
02/29/2000 11:57, Robert A Cohen
A trivial comment
,
02/29/2000 12:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-68)
,
02/29/2000 12:08, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: How well I remember 1600
,
02/29/2000 12:13, Marc Kossover
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/29/2000 12:18, crawford j maccallum
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/29/2000 12:19, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-68)
,
02/29/2000 12:21, Hugh Haskell
Re: The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 12:30, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-68)
,
02/29/2000 13:14, Richard W. Tarara
Re: The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 13:16, Daniel Schroeder
Re: How well I remember 1600
,
02/29/2000 13:23, Gary Karshner
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-68)
,
02/29/2000 14:17, Hugh Haskell
Federal $$ and education
,
02/29/2000 14:58, David Ward
Re: Me & my soapbox: was(PHYS-L Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-68))
,
02/29/2000 14:58, Joel Rauber
Re: The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 15:02, SSHS KPHOX
Re: Teaching for tests, was PHYS-L Digest
,
02/29/2000 15:04, Chuck Britton
Re: The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 15:04, Jim Green
Re: The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 15:19, Daniel Schroeder
Teaching for tests, was PHYS-L Digest
,
02/29/2000 15:30, Ludwik Kowalski
...yeah, its better to get the students "prepped" for a test they have to take than for them not to
,
02/29/2000 15:38, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Me & my soapbox: was(PHYS-L Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-68))
,
02/29/2000 15:52, Hugh Haskell
Re: ...yeah, its better to get the students "prepped" for a test they haveto take than for them not to
,
02/29/2000 15:54, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Teaching for tests, was PHYS-L Digest
,
02/29/2000 16:06, Hugh Haskell
Re: The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 16:19, Steven T. Ratliff
Re: The sign of work
,
02/29/2000 16:57, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Teaching for tests, was PHYS-L Digest
,
02/29/2000 17:10, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: ...yeah, its better to get the students "prepped" for a test they
,
02/29/2000 17:13, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Teaching to the test
,
02/29/2000 18:40, Shapiro, Mark
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
02/29/2000 18:49, brian whatcott
Re: ...yeah, its better to get the students "prepped" for a test they
,
02/29/2000 18:55, Rick Tarara
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/29/2000 19:09, brian whatcott
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/29/2000 19:21, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-68)
,
02/29/2000 20:02, Jack Uretsky
Federal $$ for Education/re to Hugh
,
02/29/2000 21:21, David Ward
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ? (rambling but not long)
,
02/29/2000 21:24, brian whatcott
Re: Federal $$ for Education/re to Hugh
,
03/01/2000 00:55, Hugh Haskell
Re: Education
,
03/01/2000 01:50, Jane Jackson
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc