Phys-L Archive Search using Namazu: a Full-Text Search Engine

This index contains 84,959 documents and 1,040,455 keywords.

Last modified: 2025-05-11

Results:

References: [ good (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ theoretical: 1262 ] [ physicist: 2113 ]

Total 169 documents matching your query.

121. Re; Physics Ethnography (score: 13): Author: rrhake at EARTHLINK.NET (Richard Hake); Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:33:21 -0500; In her PhysLrnR post of 25 Aug 2005 22:17:06-0400 titled "Physics Ethnography," Leslie Dickie wrote, in part: "I'd like to add to Dewey's suggestion of an ethnographic study . . . [Nespor (1994)]. .; /archives/2005/08_2005/msg00311.html (6,825 bytes)
122. black hole information (non)paradox (score: 13): Author: John Denker <jsd@AV8N.COM>; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 05:19:18 -0400; By JANE WARDELL, Associated Press Writer LONDON - After almost 30 years of arguing that a black hole swallows up everything that falls into it, astrophysicist Stephen Hawking backpedaled Thursday. In; /archives/2004/07_2004/msg00050.html (7,837 bytes)
123. black hole information (non)paradox (score: 13): Author: Chuck Britton <britton@NCSSM.EDU>; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 11:54:31 -0400; And a few (?) years back, didn't Hawking concede a bet that Black Holes would never be observed? I seem to remember a subscription to Playboy being at stake! At 5:19 AM -0400 7/16/04, John Denker wro; /archives/2004/07_2004/msg00055.html (8,406 bytes)
124. black hole information (non)paradox (score: 13): Author: Bernard Cleyet <anngeorg@PACBELL.NET>; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:15:32 -0700; Sounds an oxymoron to me, even Hawking radiation is not a Black Hole. Of course, this (observe black hole) depends on what one means by observation. bc Chuck Britton wrote: And a few (?) years back,; /archives/2004/07_2004/msg00068.html (8,744 bytes)
125. COLD FUSION (score: 13): Author: Ludwik Kowalski <kowalskil@MAIL.MONTCLAIR.EDU>; Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:57:07 -0400; Some of you might be interested in what a journalist, Beth Daley, wrote in Boston Globe today. http://www,boston.com/news/science/articles/2004/07/27/ heating_up_a_cold_theory?mode=PF It is an articl; /archives/2004/07_2004/msg00160.html (3,784 bytes)
126. COLD FUSION (score: 13): Author: Ludwik Kowalski <kowalskil@MAIL.MONTCLAIR.EDU>; Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:20:54 -0400; REPOSTING: Some of you might be interested in what a journalist, Beth Daley, wrote in Boston Globe today. http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2004/07/27/ heating_up_a_cold_theory?mode=PF It i; /archives/2004/07_2004/msg00161.html (3,739 bytes)
127. cold fusion (score: 13): Author: Ludwik Kowalski <kowalskil@MAIL.MONTCLAIR.EDU>; Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:30:59 -0400; REPOSTING Some of you might be interested in what a journalist, Beth Daley, wrote in Boston Globe today. http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2004/07/27/ heating_up_a_cold_theory?mode=PF It is; /archives/2004/07_2004/msg00162.html (3,742 bytes)
128. I am confused (score: 13): Author: Ludwik Kowalski <kowalskil@MAIL.MONTCLAIR.EDU>; Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:12:23 -0400; The message to which I am replying now was posted on Phys-L. But after posting this message I received this from the server: Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it appears to ha; /archives/2004/07_2004/msg00163.html (5,642 bytes)
129. I am confused (score: 13): Author: Jack Uretsky <jlu@HEP.ANL.GOV>; Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:55:59 -0500; I get the same response to each message I submit to Physics-L. I've learned to just ignore them. Jack On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Ludwik Kowalski wrote: The message to which I am replying now was posted on; /archives/2004/07_2004/msg00165.html (6,150 bytes)
130. Setting up problems (score: 13): Author: Bernard Cleyet <anngeorg@PACBELL.NET>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:47:37 -0700; "I think, Bob, what people were responding to is the part about 'have them look at the related equations'". OK here's related equations: The generalized solution for numerical modeling of two dimensi; /archives/2003/10_2003/msg00068.html (5,964 bytes)
131. Setting up problems (score: 13): Author: Jack Uretsky <jlu@HEP.ANL.GOV>; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 09:48:36 -0500; I don't understand how this fits into the preceding dialogue. It seems to take the phrase "rlated equations" out of the context in which it had been used. Regards, Jack On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Bernard Cl; /archives/2003/10_2003/msg00069.html (6,496 bytes)
132. Linguistic difficulties (RE: Measuring Volts?) (score: 13): Author: John Clement <clement@HAL-PC.ORG>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 08:45:20 -0600; John Clement wrote: ... Often college students have the same difficulty. This difficulty of course happens in daily life. For example people will say you need a certain square footage of shingles to; /archives/2002/12_2002/msg00158.html (9,123 bytes)
133. Scientific Methods (score: 13): Author: Richard Hake <rrhake@EARTHLINK.NET>; Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 20:05:27 -0700; Please excuse this cross posting to discussion lists with archives at: Phys-L <http://lists.nau.edu/archives/phys-l.html>, PhysLrnR <http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/physlrnr.html>, In his Phy; /archives/2002/09_2002/msg00029.html (8,142 bytes)
134. Tenure-Track Position in Physics (score: 13): Author: "Shapiro, Mark" <mshapiro@EXCHANGE.FULLERTON.EDU>; Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:43:02 -0700; Dear Colleagues: Please pass the following information on to anyone who might be interested: DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS - CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FULLERTON COLLEGE OF NATURAL SCIENCES AND MATHEMATICS; /archives/2002/08_2002/msg00462.html (6,373 bytes)
135. Tenure-Track Position in Physics (score: 13): Author: "Shapiro, Mark" <mshapiro@EXCHANGE.FULLERTON.EDU>; Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:54:29 -0700; There was an erroneous link in the ad previously sent. The correct link is included below, and apologies for the formatting problems. We are using OUTLOOK as our mail handler..... Mark --Original Mes; /archives/2002/08_2002/msg00465.html (6,909 bytes)
136. Source of quotation? (score: 13): Author: William Beaty <billb@ESKIMO.COM>; Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 16:13:42 -0700; On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Shapiro, Mark wrote: Does anyone remember who it was that said something like: "Your talk presented information that is both new and interesting. U= nfortunately, what is interes; /archives/2002/08_2002/msg00228.html (5,017 bytes)
137. Current Flow (shouldn't it be "charge flow?") (score: 13): Author: John Clement <clement@HAL-PC.ORG>; Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 15:46:57 -0500; The point of view of teaching the subject should actually be different from the view that a professional physicist has. While it is convenient to specify charge as a continuous property, this point o; /archives/2002/04_2002/msg00310.html (8,113 bytes)
138. Homework (Was Measure of student understanding) (score: 13): Author: John Clement <clement@HAL-PC.ORG>; Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 22:00:43 -0500; As far as the topic of homework and what works there is a significant body of research that can be used to guide practice. Also there are some theoretical considerations that flow from this research.; /archives/2002/04_2002/msg00476.html (13,711 bytes)
139. Ten Learning Principles - Worthwhile or Not? (score: 13): Author: Jack Uretsky <jlu@HEP.ANL.GOV>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 18:48:57 -0600; Hi all I've been busy on a legal matter. I apologize for the delay in responding. On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Richard Hake wrote (in relevant part): In his Phys-l post of 30 Jan 2002 00:24:08-0600 titled "R; /archives/2002/02_2002/msg00470.html (8,951 bytes)
140. Gee G-2 is wrong! (score: 13): Author: Jack Uretsky <jlu@HEP.ANL.GOV>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:56:45 -0600; Hi allI've been waiting for this. The Brookhaven press-release raises some credibility problems, which I'll write about when I have time. But for starters, not many experimentalists will stake a clai; /archives/2001/02_2001/msg00333.html (5,759 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

This search system is powered by Namazu v2.0.21

changeme.com