Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-L] Trick photography?



An obvious example =>
By definition, a geosynchronous satellite has a ZERO apparent velocity. Just as obviously, this is achieved by matching the earth observer's ANGULAR velocity, not his linear speed. The observer and satellite LINEAR speeds are vastly different!

-----Original Message----- From: Bob Sciamanda
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 11:23 AM
To: Bob Sciamanda ; Phys-L@Phys-L.org
Subject: Re: [Phys-L] Trick photography?

I'm still learning (a good sign)! ==>
I am just realizing that the apparent moon speed is NOT calculable as the
moon's linear orbital speed minus the linear spin speed of an earth surface
point.

IE., Vap is NOT= {(6.28*250000)/(30*24) - (6.28*4000)/24} miles/hr. This is
grossly wrong - even in direction!

Instead, Vap = {6.28/(30*24)-6.28/24}*250000 miles/hr. => the relative
ANGULAR velocity times the moon's orbital radius.

It is incorrect to treat the earth observer as viewing a linear motion from
a linear moving frame. We must acknowledge that the earth observer is
viewing a rotational motion from a rotational frame. Note that this turns
the moon's actual EASTWARD motion into the observed WESTWARD motion. The
linear mistreatment fails to even do this.

Again, thanks to John M for leading me to this realization.


Bob Sciamanda
Physics, Edinboro Univ of PA (Em)
treborsci@verizon.net
http://sciamanda.com

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l

Bob Sciamanda
Physics, Edinboro Univ of PA (Em)
treborsci@verizon.net
http://sciamanda.com