Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Your original statement was that many physics CONCEPTS are
counterintuitive. These examples are not concepts, they are behaviors. I
agree the behaviors are counterintuitive, just like magic tricks. The
concepts which explain the behaviors are NOT counterintuitive. And just
like magic tricks, once you understand the concept, you're left to
appreciate the skill of the prestidigitator even if you understand the
concept.
-----Original Message-----four
From: Phys-l [mailto:phys-l-bounces@phys-l.org] On Behalf Of Anthony
Lapinski
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:54 PM
To: Phys-L@Phys-L.org
Subject: Re: [Phys-L] The Make-Believe World of Real-World Physics
These are just my observations over nearly 25 years of teaching -- at
schools in three states. Physics ideas make you really think, unlikethose in
biology or chemistry. I'm not really talking about falling bodies. Youcan easily
drop two (different mass) steel balls, and they will hit at the sametime. This
might be counterintuitive, but at least students can SEE this demo. I'mtalking
more counterintuitive things like these:peak?
MOTION: Throw a ball straight upward. What is its acceleration at the
The ball and three hill problem (constant angle, concave, and convex) -which
hits the bottom first?the
FORCES: Helium balloon in car. When the car accelerates, which way does
balloon move?acting
Two equal masses attached to the ends of a string which passes over a
pulley. What is the string tension?
Tug-of-war -- which team pulls with more force? What determines the
winner?
GRAVITATION: Orbiting astronauts in the ISS. They float, but is gravity
on them?mirror
SPRINGS: Cut a spring in half, what happens to its stiffness?
MOMENTUM: To best knock something over, would you throw a ball that
sticks or one that rebounds?
FLUIDS: When an ice cube melts in a glass of water, what happens to the
water level?
Stick your finger in a beaker of water on the scale (but don't touch the
bottom). What happens to the scale reading?
HEAT: Why do some pots have copper bases and steel sides?
Ball and ring demo. Heat it -- what happens to the hole?
ELECTRICITY: Three bulbs connected in series to a battery. Which bulb
receives current first?
SOUND: What wave property is primarily responsibility for your voice
sounding louder through a (non-electric) cheerleader horn?
OPTICS: To see more of yourself in a plane mirror, should you hold the
closer, farther, or do you need a larger mirror?formed?
If you cover the top half of a lens, what happens to the real images
counterintuitive as
These are some of the many peer instruction questions I ask my (high
school) students for the topics I teach. Very practical and
they stump most of my kids, even my "honors" ones.but on
Would your students find these counterintuitive? These questions are
intended to make students think in ways they never have before. And
thinking (and, thus, physics) is difficult.
Anyone have other "counterintuitive" questions?
Phys-L@Phys-L.org writes:
-----Original Message-----because
From: Phys-l [mailto:phys-l-bounces@phys-l.org] On Behalf Of Anthony
Lapinski
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 10:19 AM
To: Phys-L@Phys-L.org
Subject: Re: [Phys-L] The Make-Believe World of Real-World Physics
Compared to most other subjects they take in high school. This is
many physics concepts are counterintuitive. And then there's the maththat's apples
element, reading/interpreting word problems, graphing, etc. Physics
IS difficult. I'm not comparing physics to "living in the real world"
--
and oranges. I'm talking about physics as a part or their academics.Toughest
(intro) subject they will take. This has been my experience.
You say many physics concepts are counterintuitive. As I get older and
teach more, I am doubting that more and more. I believe that what
seems to students to be "counterintuitive" is probably just a failure
to actually think about what is happening. Part of improving our
teaching is related to pointing the students to actually think about a
situation rather than merely reacting.
One of those counterintuitive concepts may be "falling objects near the
surface of the Earth accelerate at the same rate, ignoring air
resistance." (Don't pounce on my wording.) What we have to do is guide
the students to not think of acceleration as a "fundamental" property,
but to get them to examine the force. More massive objects DO have
more force on them , mg, where g is NOT the acceleration "of gravity"
but the strength of Earth's gravitational field. Another concept is
that the strength of the field doesn't depend on the falling object,
_______________________________________________Earth's mass and distance, etc. Then get them to think what theteacher.
associated acceleration should be (a = F/m = mg/m = g (for a numerical
answer, NOT a concept)).
As physicists teaching physics, we need to rid ourselves of the idea
that physics concepts are counterintuitive and begin to develop better
explanations that emphasize the intuitive basis of physics. And that's
why we should oppose biologists and mathematicians who took one
introductory physics course or passed some education multiple choice
test from EVER teaching high school physics. I'd rather receive a
student who never had physics in high school vs. one who had a poor
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l