Chronology
Current Month
Current Thread
Current Date
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
[
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
[
Thread Prev
] [
Thread Next
]
[
Date Prev
] [
Date Next
]
Re: [Phys-L] "Electric current" does not mean "electron flow"
From
: Chuck Britton <
cvbritton@mac.com
>
Date
: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:53:13 +0000
Thanks for the Question. NOW I know what to do with the next burned-out 500 W halogen bulb that comes my way.
The traditional test is to wrap a 120 VAC cord around each end of the glass rod and torch the middle thereof until the self-heating takes over.
'Twill be fun to try with the fused quartz tube.
On Dec 22, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Bernard Cleyet wrote:
And I've asked this before, is fused silica a non-conductor?
bc
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [Phys-L] "Electric current" does not mean "electron flow"
From:
John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
References
:
Re: [Phys-L] "Electric current" does not mean "electron flow"
From:
Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
Prev by Date:
[Phys-L] Wall warts and other Green devils
Next by Date:
Re: [Phys-L] "Electric current" does not mean "electron flow"
Previous by thread:
Re: [Phys-L] "Electric current" does not mean "electron flow"
Next by thread:
Re: [Phys-L] "Electric current" does not mean "electron flow"
Index(es):
Date
Thread