Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
-----Original Message-----
From: phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu [mailto:phys-l-
bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu] On Behalf Of Bernard Cleyet
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 1:19 PM
To: Forum for Physics Educators
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] Mau[n]der minimum
On 2011, Jun 16, , at 17:13, John Clement wrote:
But such a minimum might give us temporary
breathing space for dealing with global warming.
I think this would be a worse result. The "deniers" would point to GCC
as a left conspiracy as a result of a Maunder amelioration. What we
need is fast and furious GCC results to convince everyone a Manhattan
project (carbon sequestration) is necessary, plus, e.g., $10/gal.
gasoline and a 100% carbon surcharge, and world wide free and on demand
birth control and abortion, etc. etc.
bc thinks child deduction should be changed to an increased tax.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l