Re: [Phys-l] solar panel safety revisited

[Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>]

They supposedly were less affluent, and, therefore, wished to save on Cu.

The first day I visited the machine shop at Keele U., one of the machinists warned me about the 220 V domestic supply.  He's the person who replied when I questioned the lack of panic bars on the Physics building's doors, "Being British, we don't panic."

bc still enjoying Keele memories.

p.s. "... executed with spring caps."     [wire nuts]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twist-on_wire_connector


I point out that referring someone to a URL implies approval of the URL's contents.

Our litigious society requires us to disclaim?

On 2010, Jun 08, , at 16:54, Brian Whatcott wrote:

> (and its easy to respond that other nations have higher domestic 
> electrocution rates.)



",,, observe that they read what well-qualified people  [like you!]  seemed 
to say about wiring in panels and who put such advice to use.

Accordingly, it seems to me like a safer approach to point to URLs which 
offer NEC  rule interpretation. Here are a couple....



<http://www.nmsu.edu/~tdi/Photovoltaics/Codes-Stds/PVnecSugPract.htm>


<http://www.altestore.com/howto/data/pdf/PV-NEC-V-1.9-opt.pdf>


Sincerely

Brian W