Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Cramster et al.



Don't interfere, Brian! I've got popcorn made.






________________________________
From: Brian Whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>
To: Forum for Physics Educators <phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu>
Sent: Sat, May 15, 2010 11:15:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] Cramster et al.

Uh?


Jack Uretsky wrote:
If you intend the remarks in your last paragraph to apply to Physics
Letters B, I suggest that you forward the remarks to the editor; it would
be amusing to see if there is any physicist who agrees with you (in that
context), or if you get sued for defamation.
Regards,
Jack

----
On Sat, 15 May 2010, John Clement wrote:

/snip/
To see how physicists actually proceed, when exploring new phenomena, I suggest you follow the workings of the Atlas collaboration at the LHC; the collaboration's first paper has been accepted for publication in Physics Letters B.

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l