Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Is the Gamow; Bohr-Weizsäcker model passé?



On Feb 7, 2010, at 5:27 PM, Bernard Cleyet wrote:
I include Gamow because:

Mr Tompkins and the Chinese whispers - 08 July 1995 - New Scientist


-------------------------------------


Ignoring the question, would charging a drop (water?) cause it to fission or would it alpha decay? Also could one "shoot" a small drop at a large one and induce fission?

The reason I ask is, as those who have "looked" at my recent post know, a friend photographs drop collisions. All are of ~ equal size and the result is "splat". Perhaps a small drop would induce fission instead. (?)

bc

1) I do not see any Gamow included. But that is OK.
2) OK, I am ignoring the first question.
3) The second question refers to neutral drops of water. It consists of two sub-questions, for any particular kinetic energy of the small drop, and any particular impact parameter (initial angular momentum) of the two-body system.

a) Would the two drops (large and small) fuse?

b) What happens after that ?

Right?


Ludwik Kowalski
= = = = = = = = = = = = =

Ludwik's new book--"Tyranny to Freedom: Diary of a Former Stalinist"-- is now available at www.amazon.com

also see:

http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/mybook2.html