Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."

From: William Robertson <wrobert9@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:51:58 -0700

This is why reading and comprehension skills are so very important. I never said that evolution was controversial. I just said that it is a theory (a good one) rather than a fact.

Bill

On Dec 21, 2010, at 5:17 PM, William Robertson wrote:

evolution,
which is about as controversial as the fact that matter has mass.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
  - From: brian whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>

References:
- [Phys-l] internal/external conservative/nonconservative forces !?!?
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] internal/external conservative/nonconservative forces!?!?
  - From: "LaMontagne, Bob" <RLAMONT@providence.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] internal/external conservative/nonconservative forces!?!?
  - From: "John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>
- Re: [Phys-l] internal/external conservative/nonconservative forces!?!?
  - From: "LaMontagne, Bob" <RLAMONT@providence.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] internal/external conservative/nonconservative forces!?!?
  - From: William Robertson <wrobert9@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] internal/external conservative/nonconservative forces!?!?
  - From: "LaMontagne, Bob" <RLAMONT@providence.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] internal/external conservative/nonconservative forces!?!?
  - From: ludwik kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>
- [Phys-l] Reality versus models of realty
  - From: ludwik kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] Reality versus models of realty
  - From: "D.V.N. Sarma" <dvnsarma@gmail.com>
- [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
  - From: ludwik kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
  - From: ludwik kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
  - From: "John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>
- Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
  - From: William Robertson <wrobert9@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
  - From: William Robertson <wrobert9@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
  - From: "John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>
- Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
  - From: William Robertson <wrobert9@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
  - From: brian whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>
- Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
  - From: William Robertson <wrobert9@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
Previous by thread: Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] About the "why" and "how questins."
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread