| Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
| [Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Is that your general method of evaluating the worth of a scientific paper?
I suppose you think that if the work was funded by an oil company (not
that it was)or a conservative think tank (not that it was) that it must be
worthless. There are many kinds of bias in science. It's not just
limited to funding source. On the other hand, do you suppose that a good
and honest scientist could give an honest report of his/her findings, even
if funded by such sources?