Re: [Phys-l] Greenhouse

[marx@phy.ilstu.edu]

Is that your general method of evaluating the worth of a scientific paper?

I suppose you think that if the work was funded by an oil company (not
that it was)or a conservative think tank (not that it was) that it must be
worthless.  There are many kinds of bias in science.  It's not just
limited to funding source.  On the other hand, do you suppose that a good
and honest scientist could give an honest report of his/her findings, even
if funded by such sources?


> Before I spend time reading this could someone let me know the funding
> sources of these authors?
>
> Bob at PC
>
> ________________________________________
> From: phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> [phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu] On Behalf Of Espinosa, James
> [JEspinosa@mail.twu.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 10:10 AM
> To: Forum for Physics Educators
> Subject: [Phys-l] Greenhouse
>
> A very few on this list might be interested in reading the article:
> "Falsification of the Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within the Frame
> of Physics," by Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner.  It appears that
> most already are quite sure that global warming is due to humans.
>
> James Espinos
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l