Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] study of IP and AB



However the latest study by Philip Sadler showed that AP had a very modest effect on college physics grades. But did Fordham actually have any evidence for whether students actually understood the material??? The Fordham foundation has not paid any attention to PER as of the last time I looked, and they never disliked a curriculum which loaded more material in the name of rigorousness.

John M. Clement
Houston, TX


The Fordham foundation recently put out a report evaluating AP and IB. The evaluation goes into some detail.

Entry point:
http://edexcellence.net/foundation/publication/publication.cfm?id=378
Nutshell summary:
http://www.edexcellence.net/doc/APIB_Nutshell.pdf
Full report (52 pages) [recommended]:
http://www.edexcellence.net/doc/APIB.pdf

And there is a Washington Post article on the subject that I found
amusing:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/13/AR2007111300695.html?hpid=news-col-blog

To boil down the report to few sentences, the foundation found
the AP and IB situation to be "mostly encouraging". This is in
stark contrast to their opinion of state standards, "which have consistently shown that expectations for American primary and secondary students are typically weak and watered down."

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l