Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] explanatory and response variables (was calibration )



Right, I think. Without agreement, there is no communication, hence, no teaching.

Regards,
Jack
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Joseph Bellina wrote:

It seems to me that graphs are basically tools to use to solve a
problem we are faced with, so Hugh's suggestion make sense. It does
mean of course that you have to agree on other conventions, as in
this case, that the experiment results will be discussed in terms of
cm/sec, rather than sec/cm. Or would that be ok to use sec/cm?

joe

Joseph J. Bellina, Jr. Ph.D.
Professor of Physics
Saint Mary's College
Notre Dame, IN 46556

On Aug 8, 2007, at 11:52 PM, Hugh Haskell wrote:

At 23:35 -0400 8/8/07, Ken Fox wrote:

Egad! I had no idea of how confused my students must have been as
I blithely
discussed that the independent variable should be on the x or
horizontal
axis and the dependent on the y or vertical axis.

So what do you tell your students when they do an experiment where
they put photogates at fixed positions along, say, a tilted air
track, and measure the times that the glider passes them. Have they
not done an experiment where the independent variable is distance and
the dependent variable is time? And if so what do you tell them when
they plot time on the y-axis and distance on the horizontal, and find
that the velocity measurements come out in sec/m?

Why worry about dependent and independent at all? If they are not in
a position to figure out for themselves what the optimum way to plot
a graph is, then just tell them put whichever variable will be the
numerator of slope measurements on the y-axis and the other one on
the x-axis. And when they complain that their chemistry teacher told
them to worry about dependent and independent variables, just tell
them that you are freeing them from that restriction. All they have
to do now is to think about what they are going to do and do the
thing that makes most sense. That means about a million arbitrary
rules that they no longer have to worry about.

Then you can take up a collection among your faculty colleagues to
provide help for the chemistry teacher who just had a nervous
breakdown, because now his most righteous rules
(dependent/independent variables and significant figures--see earlier
posts) have both been violated.

Hugh
--

************************************************************
Hugh Haskell
<mailto:haskell@ncssm.edu>
<mailto:hhaskell@mindspring.com>

(919) 467-7610

Hard work often pays off after time. But Laziness always pays off now.

February tagline on 2007 Demotivator's Calendar
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l


--
"Trust me. I have a lot of experience at this."
General Custer's unremembered message to his men,
just before leading them into the Little Big Horn Valley