Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
On 08/02/2007 08:44 AM, Rauber, Joel wrote:
As far as models are
concerned, all models that lead to the correct experimental
predictions are equally acceptable.
Occam's razor not withstanding . . .
Well, in this narrow context, yes, Occam's razor not withstanding.
The point of a good theory is to make correct _predictions_.
Without Occam's razor or something like it, you will have a
hard time /finding/ a theory that makes correct predictions,
but if-and-when you have found such a theory, it doesn't
matter whether you got there via Occam's razor or otherwise.
The flow of dependency is:
Occam's razor ---->\
\
correct predictions ----> theory is good
/
Other schemes ---->/
to prevent
overparameterization
Without Occam's razor or something similar, there will be provably
an infinite number of hypotheses, all of which are consistent with
the /old/ data, but almost none of which reliably _predict_ new data.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l