Chronology |
Current Month |
Current Thread |
Current Date |

[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |

*From*: Stefan Jeglinski <jeglin@4pi.com>*Date*: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:09:32 -0400

1) Interesting part: The words talk about energy, which is correct ...

so make the symbols agree with the words. Just get rid of every mention

of "Q" and "d'", and then the rest is correct. Specifically:

"you heat the water, d'Q = CvdT"becomes "you heat the water, dE = Cv dT".

It's just that simple. Thermodynamics is not nearly so complicated and

ugly as the thermo books make it seem.

OK, at the risk of making it harder than it is, and to satisfy my own need for more rigor (this really is the crux of where I'm going with this example):

I have some water and I'm going to put E in. Experimentally I know that T will change as long as I'm not changing the phase. I suspect, but maybe I'm not 100% sure until I study it further (work with me here), that S changes also. So I'm inclined to express the math this way:

[1] dE = (dE/dS)(const T) dS + (dE/dT)(const S) dT

But those partial derivatives are not particularly simple thermodynamic quantities, so I want to recast this in terms that are more obvious, namely:

[2] dE = (dE/dV)(const T) dV + (dE/dT)(const V) dT = CvdT (for dV = 0)

But I can just as easily write:

[3] dE = (dE/dS)(const V) dS + (dE/dV)(const S) dV = TdS (for dV = 0)

So for this example, dE = TdS and dE = CvdT, both true for dV = 0.

Fine. If I know dE, I can get dT and then with some simple math, dS. Rigorous enough for me, no Q, and no d'. Interestingly, I found myself guilty of doing exactly what I was trying to avoid. That is, I was trying to avoid casting the problem as splitting dE up into "d'Q" and "d'W," but saddled myself by insisting on splitting it up into dS and dT. Not in the same league perhaps since there is nothing wrong with Eq 1, but it was not convenient for the problem.

Now we turn to the phase change for which dT = 0. For this case, Eq 2 implies that there can be no phase change without a volume change, unless (dE/dV)(const T) is exactly zero. In fact, more than implying so, it seems to constitute a proof of sorts (?)

Anyway, for the phase change Eq 1 would seem to be my choice here, since I don't a priori know how the volume changes. I know that dE will be the latent heat of vaporization for the water-steam phase change, or that of fusion for the water-ice phase change. But to use Eq 1, I shall need to find out what thermodynamic quantity(s) represents (dE/dS)(const T). Or use an even better relationship (E(S,P) and enthalpy comes to mind obviously).

My greater concern at this point is the observation about linear independence of, say, T and S in Eq 1. How does one avoid this pitfall in general? From Eqs 2-3 I know that dS = Cv(dT/T), so Eq 1 should be "safe" albeit inconvenient. But that was in no way obvious until I had "solved" the problem.

Stefan Jeglinski

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: [Phys-l] thermo differential and extensive/intensive variables***From:*John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>

**[Phys-l] Photon Thermodynamics***From:*"Jeffrey Schnick" <JSchnick@Anselm.Edu>

**References**:**[Phys-l] thermo differential and extensive/intensive variables***From:*Stefan Jeglinski <jeglin@4pi.com>

**Re: [Phys-l] thermo differential and extensive/intensive variables***From:*John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>

**Re: [Phys-l] thermo differential and extensive/intensive variables***From:*Stefan Jeglinski <jeglin@4pi.com>

**Re: [Phys-l] thermo differential and extensive/intensive variables***From:*John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: [Phys-l] thermo differential and extensive/intensive variables** - Next by Date:
**Re: [Phys-l] thermo differential and extensive/intensive variables** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [Phys-l] thermo differential and extensive/intensive variables** - Next by thread:
**Re: [Phys-l] thermo differential and extensive/intensive variables** - Index(es):