Chronology
Current Month
Current Thread
Current Date
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
[
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
[
Thread Prev
] [
Thread Next
]
[
Date Prev
] [
Date Next
]
Re: [Phys-l] battery redux and again (part deux)
From
: John Denker <
jsd@av8n.com
>
Date
: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:29:42 -0500
I just added a new subsection to my "battery" writeup:
http://www.av8n.com/physics/battery.htm#sec-electro-chemical
Executive summary:
Charge is part of the stoichiometry.
That is, chemical reactions won't proceed unless you account
for all the atoms /and/ for all the charge.
If you try to think about the chemistry separately from the
charge-balance, you have no hope of understanding how batteries
work. For the next level of detail, see
http://www.av8n.com/physics/battery.htm#sec-electro-chemical
This point is woefully under-emphasized in the usual textbook
treatments. Indeed, the usual discussion of ``oxidation numbers''
has a tendency to obscure this point rather than to clarify it.
References
:
Re: [Phys-l] battery redux and again (part deux)
From:
Larry Smith <larry.smith@snow.edu>
Re: [Phys-l] battery redux and again (part deux)
From:
John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
Re: [Phys-l] battery redux and again (part deux)
From:
"Jeffrey Schnick" <JSchnick@Anselm.Edu>
Re: [Phys-l] battery redux and again (part deux)
From:
Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
Re: [Phys-l] battery redux and again (part deux)
From:
"Jeffrey Schnick" <JSchnick@Anselm.Edu>
Re: [Phys-l] battery redux and again (part deux)
From:
John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
Re: [Phys-l] battery redux and again (part deux)
From:
Rick Tarara <rtarara@saintmarys.edu>
Re: [Phys-l] battery redux and again (part deux)
From:
John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
Prev by Date:
[Phys-l] Mythbusters
Next by Date:
Re: [Phys-l] Mythbusters
Previous by thread:
Re: [Phys-l] battery redux and again (part deux)
Next by thread:
Re: [Phys-l] battery redux and again (part deux)
Index(es):
Date
Thread