Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Refractive index of gases



I wrote:

Or look in Feynman.


On 02/08/2007 08:29 PM, alex brown wrote:
Thanks John,

However, it still leaves me with having to look up constants.... But more worryingly can I say
that the permitivity of the gas as a whole is the sum of the permitivyt of the atoms that it is
made up of? I don't know ?

1) Indeed there is a linear relationship, in the low-density limit.

2) I don't want to nitpick the terminology, but properly speaking
the permittivity is not what you want to be summing, but rather
the refractivity:
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Refractivity.html


>> Or look in Feynman.

Maybe I need to be more explicit.

Volume I chapter 31 is entitled "The Origin of the Refractive Index".
Equation 31.19 gives a nice simple expression, valid in the low-density
limit.

Volume II chapter 32 revisits this topic in more detail, in particular
considering dense materials also, including the Clausius-Mossotti
formula, equation 32.32. The bottom of page 32-6 explains in detail
how to reconcile the low-density limit with the general result.

Section 32-5 is "The index of a mixture". See in particular equation
32.37. For low-density materials (such as gasses), write the index as
(1+refractivity) and expand n^2 to first order.

=====================

can I say
that the permitivity of the gas as a whole is the sum of ....

As a famous man once said, "To first order, everything is linear".
That's actually not /strictly/ true, but it's true enough to tell
you what to expect in this case.

The Clausius-Mossotti formula is definitely nonlinear, but you can
easily show that it becomes linear in the low-refractivity limit.

=====================

Sometimes hints are just hints ... but sometimes hints are a backhanded
way of super-hyper-ultra-emphasizing something.

If something is discussed in Feynman, it's probably going to be well worth
reading. Therefore if somebody even vaguely hints that a topic might be
discussed there, you should more-or-less drop everything and go check.