Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] photoreceptors



There's another way of answering that question. I suspect there are various chemicals each having unique activation energies for the reactions involved in sight, therefore, it's the freq. E = h f, right

bc, too busy w/ house work to check out the below.

p.s. it's also probably the E field that does it if anything similar to Ag halide. Some time ago I remember reading about an expt. that showed this. Might be in Jenkins and White.

John Denker wrote:

On 11/22/2006 02:32 PM, Rauber, Joel wrote:


Are the rods and cones in eye fundamentally frequency or wavelength
detectors?


That's tricky because under normal conditions, there is a one-to-one
correspondence between frequency and wavelength.

So I suppose to make the question more precise, and more operational,
we need to ask what would happen if the receptor were immersed in
some super-high-index fluid, so as to change the frequency/wavelength
relationship.

It seems to me that the answer must be that frequency is far and
away the dominant factor. That's because the detection happens
at the molecular level, and the molecules are tiny compared
to the wavelength of light. So the "front end" detector can
be considered pointlike, and therefore insensitive to wavelength.


Is the answer different for rods vis a vis cones?


No, not different.

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l