Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
That doesn't seem like too bad a characterization to me. It isn't just that solar is warm and fuzzy, it that it is local. Distributed power production has some advantages in efficiency--very little transmission line loss, and the possibility of using the waste heat from the power generation to provide space heating. Nuclear is big, needs to be (but isn't always) remote, requiring long transmission lines, and, compared to solar, much less safe, and then there is the problem of the radioactive waste products that never seem to go away.
Many years ago a friend got interested in what drove people to be, at the time, strongly pro-solar and anti-nuclear. It turned out to have little to do with technology as such and more to do with power and the size of the technology. Solar was small, local and comfy, and
nuclear was large dark and powerful. So how do you address that issue?