Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Phys-L] Re: Here we go again. WTC brought down by aircraft, not.



This guy probably knows nothing about demolition work. For buildings
the size of the ones that collapsed on 9/11, literally hundreds of
carefully placed charges detonated in a precise sequence would be
required to cause a symmetric collapse. It would be highly unlikely
that anyone could place such explosives in three heavily occupied
buildings without being noticed.

Dr. Mark H. Shapiro
Professor of Physics, Emeritus
California State University, Fullerton
Phone: 714 278-3884
FAX: 714 278-5810
email: mshapiro@fullerton.edu
web: http://chaos.fullerton.edu/Shapiro.html
travel and family pictures:
http://community.webshots.com/user/mhshapiro



-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for Physics Educators [mailto:PHYS-L@list1.ucc.nau.edu] On
Behalf Of Bernard Cleyet
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 1:22 PM
To: PHYS-L@LISTS.NAU.EDU
Subject: Here we go again. WTC brought down by aircraft, not.

===
Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC:

The physics of 9/11 - including how fast and symmetrically one of the
World Trade Center buildings fell - prove that official explanations of
the collapses are wrong, says a Brigham Young University physics
professor.
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635160132,00.html

===
Professor Has Theory About 9/11 Attacks:

A BYU professor has developed a new theory about the terrorist attack in
New York on September 11, 2001. He believes planes alone did not bring
down the world trade center.
http://kutv.com/topstories/local_story_314234334.html

===

ICH 2005/11/12


bc
_______________________________________________
Phys-L mailing list
Phys-L@electron.physics.buffalo.edu
https://www.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l