[Phys-L] Re: Message Filter....

[levinson at SIU.EDU (Ruth Ann Levinson)]

Philip - I use Outlook Express.  Here is what my message rule looks
like:

"Apply this rule after message arrives
sent to PHYS-L@LISTS.NAU.EDU
move it to the Phys-L folder.

Obviously, I created a folder named Phys-L before making this rule.

Hope this helps!

Ruth Ann Levinson
Department of Physics
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, IL  62901



-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for Physics Educators [mailto:PHYS-L@list1.ucc.nau.edu] On
Behalf Of von Philp
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 10:56 PM
To: PHYS-L@LISTS.NAU.EDU
Subject: Message Filter....

Hello Everyone,
I recently joined this list and was wondering if someone could help me
filter list messages to a separate folder in Outlook Express.  I am a
member
of two other lists (AP Physics and Physhare) and I have been able to
successfully use Message Rules to filter those list messages to a
separate
mail folder.  For some reason I can't get the Phys-L messages to move to
another folder.
I'm guessing that there is someone out there using Outlook Express that
successfully accomplished moving list messages.  If that's you, can you
tell
me what you have for your "message rules"?
Thanks a bunch,
Ralph von Philp
Boonsboro High
Boonsboro, MD


----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Craft" <thecraftyphantom@AUSTRALIA.EDU>
To: <PHYS-L@LISTS.NAU.EDU>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 11:40 PM
Subject: What is Scientific Process?


> As Jack aludes below, the question of what is the "scientific process"
> looms large in the ID thread.  Also as I wrote earlier that I am
required
> to teach students (quite rightly) about the way that scientists do
their
> work.  Our mandatory syllabus makes this clear when it says we need to
> cover:
>
> 5.2     the nature and practice of science
> c)      apply scientific processes to test the validity of ideas and
> theories
> d)      describe how an idea can gain acceptance in the scientific
> community as either theory or law
> g)      identify that the nature of observations made depends upon the
> understanding that the observer brings to the situation
>
>
> My question still stands, and I really would like some input in
this...
> What is the scientific process that this syllabus assumes exists???
Are
> the distinctions made in the syllabus real?
>
> Regards
> Peter Craft
> HT Science
> Corowa High School
>
> > I cannot state too strongly how much I object to Larry's out of
context
> > partial quote of my posting.  My posting consisted of two contrasting
> > sentences which were intended to be read together.  The context of the
two
> > senttences included the "standard" AAPT definition, which I don't find
> > very enlightening.
> >
> > Misrepresentation, Larry.  Bad, Larry, really bad.
> >                                        Jack
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Larry Smith wrote:
> >
> > > At 2:59 PM -0500 8/29/05, Jack Uretsky wrote:
> > > > I have no idea what "science" is,
> > >
> > > For such cases I included the standard AAPT definition of science.
> Others
> > > may prefer their own, although I don't think the AAPT definition is
a
> bad
> > > one.
> > >
> > > Larry
> >
> > --
> > "Trust me.  I have a lot of experience at this."
> >                General Custer's unremembered message to his men,
> >                just before leading them into the Little Big Horn
Valley
> >