[Phys-L] Re: A Dill Pickle

[trappe at PHYSICS.UTEXAS.EDU (Karl Trappe)]

Brian:  Thank you for this post.  That we, as scientists are expected
to explain the technical aspects is reason enough to justify this
slightly off topic post.

I was aware of the Bilderbergs (12 financial families), but had not
fully grasped the connection with the election fraud.  Hayfield makes
it clear, that no matter who is elected, there is one group they
answer to.  Bush attended the Bilderberg meeting years ago, and
Edwards went just before being nominated to run for VP.  I would be
surprised if Gore didn't attend, since he failed to protest his own
election fraud loss.

> I am relaying this note from another list [theory-edge]
>   which I thought you might find interesting.
>
> Brian W
>
>     <<http://www.votefraud.org/>http://www.votefraud.org/>
>
> "Why am I always being asked to prove these systems aren't secure?
>   The burden of proof ought to be on the vendor.
> You ask about the hardware.
>   'Secret.'
> The software?
>   'Secret.'
> What's the cryptography?
>   'Can't tell you because that'll compromise the secrecy of the machines.'
> ... Federal testing procedures?
> 'Secret'!
>   Results of the tests?
> 'Secret'!
> Basically we are required to have blind faith."
>
> —Dr. David L. Dill
> Professor, Computer Science
> Stanford University
>
>
>
> Brian Whatcott    Altus OK    Eureka!

--
Dr. Karl I. Trappe, outreach consultant      Home (512) 264-1616
Research Scientist Associate V,              Desk (512)
471-4152/471-1823    Senior Lecturer in Physics
Physics Department, Mail Stop C-1600
The University of Texas at Austin
Austin, Texas 78712-1081