Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:17:06 -0700, Pentcho Valev <valevp@BAS.BG>, wrote:
allFirst let us solve the following problem. Relativity is
based on the axiom according to which the speed of light is costant in
inertial frames. Now ASSUME this axiom is false.
Why should we assume to be false something that has been verified to the
highest precision we can measure?
to
What do we do: A)
Immediately reject the false axiom and all its corollaries. B) Continue
use the theory untill a better one emerges.
You want "A", clearly. But in fact, even wrong theories are useful.
From the above I deduce two things: (1) That you believe that you havefound
a mistake in the derivation of the "redshift factor" [I'm all ears, please
tell us],