Chronology |
Current Month |
Current Thread |
Current Date |

[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |

*From*: David Bowman <David_Bowman@GEORGETOWNCOLLEGE.EDU>*Date*: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:49:54 -0400

Regarding Carl's rearrangement of his formula:

First let me simplify my formula to:

tan(B) = sin(T) * cot(P-P0)

Are you happier with this? It allows negative values, although of

course it still can't distinguish quadrants I/IV from II/III.

At least twice as happy as before. Actually, the ambiguity your

result still now has is *supposed* to be there. This is because

there are 2 geodesic paths connecting two arbitrary fixed points

on a sphere going in opposite directions. Your formula now gives

both the short way *and* the long way around the sphere from the

same formula.

If you want another spherical geometry exercise,

rederive Clairaut's formula.

http://williams.best.vwh.net/avform.htm#Clairaut

Heck, I'm never going to get anything else done, but it's fun.

Equation (3) divided by (2) in my PDF gives:

tan(A) = tan(T)/sin(P-P0)

Solve this for (P-P0) and substitute into my bearing formula above

to get:

cos(T) * cos(B) = cos(A) = constant

which is Clairaut's formula, and certainly looks like a nice way to

satisfy Hugh's request for a simple method of correcting course

enroute. Swap cos(B) for sin(H) for Brian's desire to get headings

relative to north. -Carl

Good work!

David Bowman

- Prev by Date:
**Re: spherical geometry** - Next by Date:
**great-circle navigation using Clifford Algebra** - Previous by thread:
**Re: spherical geometry** - Next by thread:
**Which Strong is late"? Was: Re: Stone skipping. Was: Re: bending of object thrown into pool** - Index(es):