Georgia School Board Requires Balance of Evolution and Bible
By KATE ZERNIKE
After an angry debate among parents, Georgia's second-largest school
district adopted a policy last night that requires teachers to give a
"balanced education" about the origin of life, giving equal weight to
evolution and
biblical interpretations.
The district, Cobb County, had already come under attack this summer for
attaching disclaimers to all science textbooks, saying that evolution "is a
theory, not a fact," and should be "approached with an open mind, studied
carefully and critically considered." On Wednesday, a parent and the Georgia
chapter
of the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit demanding that the
disclaimers be removed. Yesterday, they vowed to amend the suit to ask the
court to reverse the new policy.
Board members said they were not restricting the teaching of evolution or
encouraging the teaching of creationism. The policy, they said, was simply a
reflection of the district's philosophy of teaching a wide and objective
range of ideas, particularly in discussing "disputed views of academic
subjects, including the origin of species."
After the vote, Gordon O'Neill, a board member, led his colleagues in a
prayer: "Heavenly father, we ask that you provide to all of us a clear
understanding of our fellow man and an acceptance of a diversity of
thinking. Amen."
Many parents at the board's packed meeting said the policy was a backdoor
route to teaching religion in schools. They implored the board members not
to adopt the policy, saying it would dilute the quality of science education
and make graduates of the district, which is north of Atlanta, the
laughingstock of
college admission offices.
"The loud voices of the extremist few have drowned out the voice of the
moderate majority," said Adele Marticke, who has two school-age children.
Paula Jackson, an elementary school parent, said, "It's deception and
indoctrination."
But others urged the board to open the classroom to religious points of
view.
"To deny there is a God is to stand on a building and deny there is a
building," said Russell Brock, who described himself as an insurance
salesman and a minister.
Rick Burgess, another parent, said: "Evolution is strictly a theory, and we
don't think it should be taught as fact. It's fine if you don't teach
creationism, but you ought to be able to open up discussion of it."
The fight over how to teach the origin of life has erupted in several angry
spurts since John Scopes's 1925 trial for teaching evolution.
The Kansas state school board reinstated teaching evolution last year, after
striking it from the science curriculum two years earlier. Still,
conservatives on the board have promised to revive the issue, and a
candidate for the board who opposes the teaching of evolution won a recent
primary by a wide margin.
In Ohio, the state board of education is considering a science curriculum
that would teach "intelligent design," which accepts some evolutionary
notions about how species develop, but argues that God or a godlike creator
must have been in charge of the grand plan.
Discussing the Cobb County policy informally over the last few weeks, board
members said they were responding to the community's demand to teach a
broader range of views in science classes.
About 2,000 parents had signed petitions objecting to the board's purchase
of new science textbooks in the spring because the books taught evolution.
The parents asked the schools to give equal time to creationism, and several
school board members then asked the district's lawyers to write a policy
that would allow discussion of theories beyond evolution but not violate the
Constitution. The board's lawyers said the policy was not unconstitutional
because it did not promote any religious view as right or wrong.
But some parents said the disclaimer and talk of balance and objectivity
were simply code words for promoting creationism.
Jeffrey Selman, who is suing the school district, said science promoted
critical thinking "Why do we need a disclaimer?" he said. "It's the backdoor
into pushing religion in schools."
The policy adopted last night says that evolution "remains an area of
intense interest, research and discussion among scholars," and so should be
handled with objectivity.
Jay Dillon, a district spokesman, said teachers should teach "all sides of
an issue" instead of just evolution.
"The board was concerned that this was the only theory being presented," Mr.
Dillon said.
Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company |
Permissions | Privacy Policy