Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: improving textbooks -- some modest proposals



Or, as the doormouse said (or was it the hatter?) "but it was the
best of butter".
A salute to the person who provides the context of the statement.

Regards,
Jack

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Jane Jackson wrote:

Jack, good for you to notice. Educator interviews are, of course, NOT the
best way to determine the quality of a science program! However, it seems
to be all we have available as of yet, for new standards-based curriculum
approaches and materials.
Cheers, Jane


On Feb. 18, 2002, Jack Uretsky posted:
Here's a quote from Jane's posting:
______________________________________
It is based on interviews with
more than 100 middle-grades educators who are using standards-based
curriculum approaches and materials in their districts,
schools, and classrooms. This introductory chapter sets the
scene for the scope of the guide series, focusing on science,
but drawing examples more broadly from all of the major
middle-grades subject areas.
__________________________________________
Could someone please explain to me why this is a good way to
select textbooks? Who can take responsibility for the beliefs of these
100 educators?

Jane Jackson, Co-Director, Modeling Instruction Program
Box 871504, Dept.of Physics & Astronomy,ASU,Tempe,AZ 85287
480-965-8438/fax:965-7331 <http://modeling.asu.edu>
Genius must transform the world, that the world may produce more genius.


--
"But as much as I love and respect you, I will beat you and I will kill
you, because that is what I must do. Tonight it is only you and me, fish.
It is your strength against my intelligence. It is a veritable potpourri
of metaphor, every nuance of which is fraught with meaning."
Greg Nagan from "The Old Man and the Sea" in
<The 5-MINUTE ILIAD and Other Classics>