Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

What makes you think N#3 is correct?



Is N#3 still 'suspect' when the various fields are taken into account?
Especially the Vector Potential?



At 4:54 PM -0500 on 11/27/01, David Bowman wrote

Consider magnetic forces
acting between mutually moving charges. They don't remotely satisfy
N#3 even when they are close enough and moving slowly enough to be
able to neglect the ubiquitous retardation effects.


I just COULDN'T keep the same subject!!!!!!!
--

.-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-
\ / \ / \ N / \ C / \ S / \ S / \ M / \ / \ /
`-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-'
Chuck Britton Education is what is left when
britton@ncssm.edu you have forgotten everything
North Carolina School of Science & Math you learned in school.
(919) 286-3366 x224 Albert Einstein, 1936