Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
John Clement writes:
Basically I see evidence for about 15% of the seniors in oursome evidence
school (a private school) being in the formal category, and 30% being
concrete. By the end of my course I see the number of concrete thinkers
halved, and the number of formal thinkers doubled. There is
that shows that students who do not take physics, but do takethe same math
sequence show no rise.
I'm not sure how to interpret this. Does this mean that even at a
(presumably) elite private school only 30% of those who have taken physics
are formal thinkers at graduation? And of those who haven't
taken physics,
only 15% are formal thinkers at graduation??
That doesn't seem to differ a whole lot from our observations,
but maybe
I'm misreading what you're saying?
Wes