Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert A Cohen [mailto:bbq@ESU.EDU]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 2:40 PM
To: PHYS-L@lists.nau.edu
Subject: Why should non-scientists learn physics?
I am somewhat confused by Dan M's statement below.
I would agree that a formal error analysis technique would be
unnecessary
for non-scientists but even non-scientists need to be able to analyze
their measurements, don't they? Otherwise, why do
experiments at all? I
see too many secondary-school "experiments" in which
differences between
measurement and prediction is "hand-waved" away because
students are not
required (or expected) to do any analysis.
Just curious, why should non-scientists learn physics?
----------------------------------------------------------
| Robert Cohen Department of Physics |
| East Stroudsburg University |
| bbq@esu.edu East Stroudsburg, PA 18301 |
| http://www.esu.edu/~bbq/ (570) 422-3428 |
----------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Daniel L. MacIsaac wrote:
There are measurement analysis notes used for the firstyear physics labs
at Purdue University at http://www.physics.purdue.edu/phys152l/worksheets on
look under MA1 and MA2 for the two lectures, examples and
measurement analysis. PHY 152L is a lab for calculus-basedphysics for
engineers and scientists. I feel measurement analysis isEXTREMELY appropriate
for this population. I would NOT recommend teachingmeasurement analysis to
non-engineers or scientists; they are learning physics fordifferent reasons.
Northern AZ Univ
Dan M
Dan MacIsaac, Assistant Professor of Physics and Astronomy,
danmac@nau.edu http://purcell.phy.nau.eduPHYS-L list owner