Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: R = V/I ?



Ludwik Kowalski wrote:

OOPS,

... So why do we accept C=V/I but not R=V/I?

should have been :

So why do we accept C=Q/V but not R=V/I?

I accept both. In a situation where Q and V are linearly proportional
then Q/V is the definition of capacitance, and for any measured {Q,V} a
measurement of C. Similarly for R,V & I.


()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()

Doug Craigen
http://www.dctech.com/physics/