Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: dS=0



Bob, again I have not expressed myself well: I am after an infinitesimal
process -- such as compressing the usual piston by dV -- not a cycle or
even any kind of integral -- In the case of this usual piston dV---->dS=0
identically and if not uniquely, then uncommonly. I surmise that all
classical thermo is based on this accident -- only because Carnot was
interested in steam engines and hence simplified the problem to the
standard piston and cylinder.

Jim



Eg: an infinite variety of closed cycle processes are possible (using an
infinite variety of various combinations of Q things and W things), all
resulting in zero entropy change of the system.

Bob


Bob Sciamanda (W3NLV)
Physics, Edinboro Univ of PA (em)
trebor@velocity.net
http://www.velocity.net/~trebor

----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Green <JMGreen@SISNA.COM>
To: <PHYS-L@lists.nau.edu>
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: dS=0


> . . .
> The question on the page is "Why, if both Q-things and W-things are both
> mechanical work, what then is the difference between W and Q if any?"
The
> answer is that Q-things change the entropy and W-things do not . . .

Jim Green
mailto:JMGreen@sisna.com
http://users.sisna.com/jmgreen