Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
(not posted)course
Dear Rick,
How 'bout the vector potential or even
its spacetime four-vector counterpart?
"Potential" is used more broadly than
you suggest here.
Leigh
While we're nit-picking, the terminology 'attractive potential' is of
confusing if we follow the common definitions for potential (PE per unit
something or other) since Energy is a scalar quantity. I suppose the
terminology arises since we use potentials to get to the fields which are
vectors.
After two years of reading Phys-L and PhysLRNR, I no longer wonder why
students are so confused.
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: DSCHROEDER@cc.weber.edu
I never liked the word "force" when applied to the strong and weak
interactions, because these interactions are short-range and not
easily visualized classically. For the strong interaction there
is more or less an effective long-range potential which is always
attractive, and at still longer ranges there's the pion exchange
process between baryons which is also always attractive.