Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Received: from atlantis.cc.uwf.edu (atlantis.cc.uwf.edu [143.88.1.202])GTCC.SMTP."pjcamp@coastal.edu" 09/10/96 10:12am >>>
Does anyone have any evidence,cause
anecdotal or otherwise, that using the words 'energy flows' tend to
students to think in terms of the caloric model? Is this true even whensubstance?
the words are used along with an emphasis that energy is not a
Is there evidednce combining these two ingredients causes confusion?
> -- > --James McLean
jmclean@chem.ucsd.edu
Ok, anecdotal: Ask any student (even half the grad students you know)
to explain why the flame of a match points upwards and he will tell
you "heat rises" pretty much of the time. That this does not mean helium
balloons are hot and does not explain flames in zero g environments is
immaterial -- it indicates a readiness to conceive of something along the
lines of a caloric model for cultural reasons.
Paul J. Camp "The Beauty of the Universe
Assistant Professor of Physics consists not only of unity
Coastal Carolina University in variety but also of Conway, SC
29528 variety in unity. pjcamp@csd1.coastal.edu
--Umberto Eco pjcamp@postoffice.worldnet.att.net The Name of the
Rose
(803)349-2227 fax: (803)349-2926