Chronology |
Current Month |
Current Thread |
Current Date |

[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |

*From*: "Don" <dgpolvani@gmail.com>*Date*: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:45:27 -0400

I made an estimate of the effect of EM radiation on initial electron speed using the paper Brian Whatcott recommended (Daniel Schroeder's AAPT 1999 paper "Purcell Simplified" which referenced and recommended Edward Purcell's treatment of EM radiation in his book "Electricity and Magnetism"). Purcell develops a formula for the total electromagnetic power radiated by a charge undergoing constant acceleration (termed the "Larmor formula"). The formula is:

Power radiated = P_R = q^2*a^2/(6*pi*e_0*c^3). Where:

q = electronic charge = 1.602 x 10^-19 C

a = constant acceleration

e_0 = permittivity of free space = 8.854 x 10^-12 C^2/N m^2

c = speed of light = 2.998 x 10^8 m/s

For the acceleration I got (using Newtonian mechanics):

a = q*V/(d*m) where:

V = voltage across the two plates = 10 kv = 10^4 v

d = spacing between the two plates = 1 cm = 0.01 m

m = electronic mass = 9.109 x 10^-31 kg

This yields a = 1.759 x 10^17 m/s^2 and, with the other parameters specified above, results in:

P_R = 1.766 x 10^-19 w

To get the energy radiated (E_R), we need the time (t) the electron takes going between the two plates. Since I am only making an estimate, I again used the Newtonian result:

t = (v_f - v_i)/a where:

v_f = final speed = 0

v_i = initial speed (assuming radiation is a very small effect this is given approximately by David Bowman's special relativity result 5.846 x 10^7 m/s)

So, approximately, t = 3.323 x 10^-10 s and the total energy radiated (E_R) is:

E_R = P_R*t = 5.868 x 10^-29 J = 3.663 x 10^-10 eV since 1 eV = 1.602 x 10^-19 J

Therefore, E_R/(q*V) = 3.663 x 10^-14, so we expect the change in initial speed due to radiation to, indeed, be very small. Using David Bowman's special relativity formulation for the initial speed:

b = sqrt(2*e*(1 + e/2))/(1 + e) where:

b = v_i/c and e = q*V/(m*c^2 (assuming no radiation)

I get, using a number of approximations and small parameter expansions, the change in initial speed (delta v_i) is given by:

delta v_i/v_i = (1/2)*(E_R/(q*V)) = 1.83 X 10^-14 or about 2 x 10^-14. So the change in initial speed (delta v_i) is indeed very small due to radiation.

Can anyone make a similar approximate estimate of general relativity effects?

Don

Dr. Donald Polvani

Adjunct Faculty, Physics, Retired

Anne Arundel Community College

Arnold, MD 21012

-----Original Message-----

From: Phys-l [mailto:phys-l-bounces@mail.phys-l.org] On Behalf Of brian

whatcott

Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 10:56 PM

To: phys-l@mail.phys-l.org

Subject: Re: [Phys-L] electron velocity in an electric field.

On 4/24/2018 4:12 PM, Don via Phys-l wrote:

Thanks to Brian Whatcott for the non-relativistic and engineering details ofthis problem and David Bowman for the special relativity theoretical

correction. I'm curious if anyone can estimate the relative importance of the

radiation and general relativity corrections. Including radiation must result in

a higher initial electron velocity to supply the extra required initial KE. But it's

been too many years for me to remember how to calculate the magnitude of

the radiation, and I have no idea what general relativity does.

The Larmor formulation shows the energy dissipated by radiation from a

Don

Dr. Donald Polvani

Adjunct Faculty, Physics, Retired

Anne Arundel Community College

_______________________________________________

Forum for Physics Educators

Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org

http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l

decelerating charge. An E&M text by Purcell was used by Dan Schroeder

(Weber State) as a reference source for a talk he gave at a meeting of the

AAPT (1999). Here is the text he spoke to.

<http://physics.weber.edu/schroeder/mrr/MRRtalk.html>

The final paragraph is titled Quantitative Treatment of Radiation,

where he diagrams the Larmor formula for this case.

Brian W

_______________________________________________

Forum for Physics Educators

Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org

http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l

**References**:**[Phys-L] electron velocity in an electric field.***From:*brian whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>

**Re: [Phys-L] electron velocity in an electric field.***From:*David Bowman <David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu>

**Re: [Phys-L] electron velocity in an electric field.***From:*brian whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>

**Re: [Phys-L] electron velocity in an electric field.***From:*"Don" <dgpolvani@gmail.com>

**Re: [Phys-L] electron velocity in an electric field.***From:*brian whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: [Phys-L] Purcell Text on Electricity and Magnetism** - Next by Date:
**[Phys-L] Fwd: Help Save Physics at James Lick HS** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [Phys-L] electron velocity in an electric field.** - Next by thread:
**[Phys-L] Purcell Text on Electricity and Magnetism** - Index(es):