Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
.
On 10/18/2015 9:50 AM, Savinainen Antti wrote:
Hi,
there is an e-mail interview in Independent conducted by Steve Connor: <
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/letters-to-a-heretic-an-email-conversation-with-climate-change-sceptic-professor-freeman-dyson-2224912.html>.
It is obvious that Dyson is a genius with many valuable contributions to
physics. However, this does not mean that his (or anybody else's) views
would be automatically valid outside his expertise.
Indeed. Note, however, that Dyson does not pretend to have climate
modeling expertise but rather to have an understanding of the ways science
is advanced, the weaknesses of models, and the ways the scientific
community operates. Which he undoubtedly does. One does not need to be an
expert in biology to understand Lysenkoism. Which brings me to another
recent writeup from Matt Ridley ... not a climate expert yet certainly an
expert on science politics and climate science politics in particular. The
issue is not who is right on what climate detail, but rather how climate
science community ostracizes dissenters, manipulates its data, hides or
low-balls model uncertainties, and how it benefits from huge funding
streams while attempting to starve dissenters.
http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/what-the-climate-wars-did-to-science.aspx
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@www.phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l