Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-L] standard dc circuits



On 11/22/2013 04:31 PM, Paul Lulai wrote:
Starting at the node prior to the 2 parallel resistors. A charge q
is present in the node. I would think the field it creates to move
charges in each of the upcoming parallel braches would be the same
as the field if there were only one wire leaving that node.

Well, it's true that same q means same fields ... but that's a
red herring, because if the resistors were different the q would
be different.

It's analogous to the force and deflection you get if you pile
bricks on a trampoline. You cannot assume a_priori what the
force will be, and you cannot assume a_priori what the deflection
will be. The deflection adjusts itself so as to bring about a
force that equilibrates with the bricks. If you change the
number of bricks, the force and deflection will change. After
some complicated transient, the situation will settle into a
new equilibrium.

If the majority of the field is due to the charges closest to the
charge to be moved,

Majority? You can easily set up a situation where roughly
105% of the field acting on the resistor is due to local
charges, and negative 5% is due to fields coming directly
from the battery. Hint: flip the wires:
_____ ______________
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
----- | | Z
--- | | Z
----- | | Z
--- | | |
| | | |
| | | ________|________ <--- X
| \ / | |
| \/ | |
| /\ | |
| / \ Z Z
| | | Z Z
| | | Z Z
| | | | |
| | | | |
|_____| |_____|_________________|


I still say that for 99% of electrical engineering and 99.99%
of life in general, the macroscopic lumped-circuit approach
works just fine, and worrying about the microscopic charges
and fields is not a good use of time and effort. It is fine
to discuss it amongst ourselves, but I'm not at all convinced
we should inflict it on students in the introductory course.