Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Phys-l] Do Extremal Black Holes have Inertial mass?




Do Extremal Black Holes have Inertia?


Here is I think is an interesting question. Based on the Kerr Newman metric
we can write a generalized equation for a black hole radius as; .


R= [G/c^2]*[m+sqrt[m^2-Q^2/G-(c^2/G^2)*a^2]]

Where Q is electric charge and a is angular momentum.

This gives us two black hole radiuses , the gravitational radius R(+)
which corresponds the positive square root and the null radius R(-) which
corresponds to the negative square root. It believed that nature enforces the
relationship



M^2 = > Q^2/G- (c^2/G^2)*a^2

to avoid a naked singularity. However, the case where the null radius
equals the gravitational radius we call an Extremal Black Hole. String theory
is able to calculate rigorously the horizon degrees of freedom for Extremal
black holes only. No one knows if the Extremal state for black holes is a
physically achievable state. Certainly not black holes produced by the
gravitational collapse of spent stars, but perhaps micro black holes , akin to
subatomic particles , might exist in Extremal states. For these states the
quantization of spin should be in effect. Using the equations above we can
produce two theoretical possibilities. for Extremal black holes. Of
course there are unlimited examples.

*************************
Case 1

m= 1.22 E 5 KG

Q= 1 ( charge of positron)

s= (1/2)*hbar

R(+) =R(-) = 9.08 E-28 Meters

*****************************************


Case 2

m= 1.54E-8 KG

Q=0

s= (1/2)*hbar

R= 1.14E -35 meters

**********************************************

As an aside an interesting proposal by Copperstock and Faraoni suggest that
micro black hole radius be restricted the Compton wavelength giving an
extended Planck scale they call M_plex where solving for m in the first
equation above gives us;

M_plex= m_plk*sqrt[2*(1 +s^2)/(2-alpha*Q^2)]


Where alpha is the fine structure constant.

In any case this explanation gets us to my question. For any black hole the
gravity field equals


g= R(+) - R(-)*c^2/(2*R(+))

So given that for an Extremal black hole

R(+)=R(-) we see that

g=0

An Extremal black hole has no gravity field, in essence no gravitational
mass. So the question is does it have inertial mass. Absent inertial mass,
the Extremal BH would follow geodesics the same way photons do.

What happens to a Extremal black hole when it enters a gravity field?
Imagine the Extremal BH in case 1 above entering the gravity field of the earth.
The earth wouldn't see any gravity field from the Extremal black hole,
but would the Extremal black hole see the gravity field of the earth.

A much better way to think about this , in terms of General Relativity, is
that the Extremal black hole creates no space time curvature but the earth
does. Therefore the Extremal black hole should follows a geodesic path
created by the earth , hence effectively Extremal black holes are massless,
that is they have zero inertial mass. Note that this would seem to be
required by the equivalence principle since we must have

M_grav= k*M_inertia

Where k is any positive number and is set to unity by standard units.


Bob Zannelli