Some subscribers to Phys-L might be interested in a discussion-list
post " "Roediger's Tips for Reviewers" [Hake (2011)].
The abstract reads:
************************************************
ABSTRACT: The inadequate reviewing of articles submitted for
publication in the field of Physics Education Research (PER) suggests
revisiting Henry Roeidiger's (2007) "Twelve Tips for
Reviewers"<http://bit.ly/oOR5iQ>. I list six of those TIPS which are
often ignored by PER reviewers.
For the few "Good Reviewers" of PER article submissions who may wish
to get in step with the PER's army of "Bad Reviewers," I strongly
recommend Mohammad Sal Moslehian's "How To Be a Bad Referee?!"
<http://bit.ly/ranWvb>.
************************************************
REFERENCES [URL's shortened by <http://bit.ly/> and accessed on 28 July 2011.]
Hake, R.R. 2011. "Roediger's Tips for Reviewers," online on the OPEN!
AERA-L archives at <http://bit.ly/pPrHqY>. Post of 3 Aug 2011
10:27:03 -0700to AERA-L and Net-Gold. The abstract and link to the
complete post are being transmitted to various discussion lists and
are also on my blog "Hake'sEdStuff" at <http://bit.ly/mTRHLe> with a
provision for comments.