Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Weightless



On Nov 20, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Richard Tarara wrote:

I don't interpret what I feel in a jet aircraft accelerating forwards as weight as John seems to imply below. I feel pushed back into my chair.

Almost right. It's not so much what we feel as what we perceive. Our vision plays a strong role in that perception. I would say that it "misleads" us.

Indeed, it's interesting to note that flight simulators use the same visual misperception in reverse. By tipping you backward while maintaining a constant visual field, they manage to make use of what I believe YOU would call "real" gravity in order to make you PERCEIVE that you are, instead, merely being "pushed back in your seat" as a reaction to forward acceleration.

Same with the rotor-ride I feel pushed into the wall--not heavy.

In essence this is the same visual misperception. (The only difference here is that there are additional real effects due to the rotation and the nonuniformity of the acceleration, but these are nonsubstantive differences)

However, if I'm accelerated upwards I do feel heavier, and downwards lighter.

What is "upward" and "downward" other than the direction that your body necessarily has to align itself when you stand in an erect position on a supporting surface? Try standing in any conveyance that has a substantial horizontal acceleration. Let the floor be angled so that you can stand on it as you would a level floor; let the acceleration be uniform and noiseless; and don some blindfolds! Then tell me you don't feel heavier.

So, maybe I'm misinterpreting what John wrote, but in my experience the sensation of weight comes from vertical (or nearly so) forces with different sensations from horizontal forces. I think we might both agree though that the sensation of weight in a rotating space station IS from the surface we are standing on pushing us towards the center of rotation.

Of course. And that is because "toward the center" IS the "vertically upward" direction in that situation.

This message tends to confirm for me that this is not, at root, a dispute about what we should tell students; I don't think there is a lot of dispute there. It involves a fundamental disagreement about the nature of the world that we live in.

John Mallinckrodt

Professor of Physics, Cal Poly Pomona
<http://www.csupomona.edu/~ajm>

and

Lead Guitarist, Out-Laws of Physics
<http://outlawsofphysics.com>