Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Seeking Diagnostic Tests rides again

From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:29:15 -0400

Bill Rachinger wrote:

My earlier email indicating that I was seeking Diagnostic tests on LCR
circuits and opamps was regrettably ambiguous.

I got a good chuckle the first time I read it.

I am seeking tests to be undertaken by students to unearth
misconceptions and gaps in knowledge in their studies of these two topics.

You could get some ideas from the end-of-chapter problems in
a suitable text. Horowitz and Hill is still pretty much the
gold standard. I like it, and I've never heard anybody say
anything bad about it.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Phys-l] Seeking Diagnostic Tests rides again
  - From: "John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>
- [Phys-l] Sir, Can We Do Something Easier?
  - From: "Polvani, Donald G." <donald.polvani@ngc.com>

References:
- [Phys-l] Seeking Diagnostic Tests rides again
  - From: Bill Rachinger <bill.rachinger@spme.monash.edu.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-l] Collision of irregular bodies
Next by Date: [Phys-l] symmetry of the force (was: irregular bodies)
Previous by thread: [Phys-l] Seeking Diagnostic Tests rides again
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] Seeking Diagnostic Tests rides again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread