Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
James McLean wrote:My apologies: now that I read the text near your figure 1, I see that you describe how to take the proper differences. "DeltaV is the voltage drop across the device _in_some_chosen_direction_." (my emphasis) The penalty is of course get the wrong answer, specifically to get the wrong sign on the current from Ohm's Law.
BTW, at the above web link, it says "To label the voltage of a node in the diagram, it suffices to put a symbol next to the node." While this is true, I think it might be a tad misleading. To obtain proper voltage *differences*, reference must be made to the same orientation choices that are made for description of the currents.
That's news to me. What means "proper"? What's the penalty for
making an "improper" choice?
Absolutely. I'm sure you picked up on the fact that the quoted phrase is hyperbole. I presume that my students pick up on that too, but maybe I should check.
See <http://www.geneseo.edu/~mclean/AnalytII/demo/CircuitAnalysis.pdf>.
The soi-disant "sure-fire never-fail technique" described there may
be good enough for the most elementary applications, but is, to say
the least, far from complete.
-- The near-universal convention for positive output voltage and positiveYes, annoying, isn't it. For a chosen direction of negative to positive terminal, it "feels wrong" to say that DeltaV<0. But, AFAICT this a "choose your poison" situation. Assuming the natural choice of DeltaV for a resistor made above, you must either:
output current for a _battery_ violates rule 1.