Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
It is very dangerous to expand N2 into F = mdv/dt +v dm dt.
In my opinion there is nothing wrong with F=dp/dt
1) If part of an object merely "drops off" of amother object, with no "push
off" force, there is no interactive force, and noexchange of momentum
between the two system parts.
The difficulty comes in choosing the system and
_sticking with it_ In one
choose either the "part" or the "mother" or both ie
the cm of both, but
don't change stories during the solution.
SumFi=dp/dt is valid in each case.
2) Rockets, conveyor belts, etc (where there is aninteraction force) are
best handled by the Momentum-Impulse theorem. F*dt= Pf - Pi
This is not really a theorem - it is a derivation
from N#2:
IntFdt ~= F deltat = Int(dp/dt)dt = Pf -Pi
We also sometimes forget that Young's _invention_ of
the idea of "energy"
comes from a similar integral.
Jim
Jim Green
mailto:JMGreen@sisna.com
http://users.sisna.com/jmgreen