Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: "Voltage"



Tim Folkerts asks:

So, why are physicists so set against the term "voltage"? It seems to
me that E&M at a general physics level could be simplified by using the
word that the students recognize.

The phrase "difference in electric potential energy per unit charge"
accurately describes the concept, but is too awkward to use more than
twice in one day. We further confuse the terminology by calling the
difference in electric potential, the "potential difference", not the
"electric potential difference" or the "difference in electric
potential". It makes it sound too much like they are two completely
different ideas. (Would you even consider using something analogous
like "kinetic difference" for the difference in kinetic energy?)

It seems we could just say "voltage" instead of "electric potential"
and "voltage difference" instead of "potential difference" without any
great loss and with an increased understanding by the students and
an increased connection to the "real world".

I, personally am not real big on semantic quibbling, but HAVE on occasion
asked some more advanced students to consider the MAJOR difference between
(voltage, potential, differences or otherwise - your choice) and EMF.

It seems to me that EMF's DO NOT obey Kirchhoff's Loop Rule (please, NOT
law) and the other thing(s) mentioned do obey the loop rule.

Like you say, I have little trouble with a 1.5 volt dry cell etc. even a
120 volt outlet.

-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-
\ / \ / \ N / \ C / \ S / \ S / \ M / \ / \ /
`-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-'
Chuck Britton Education is what is left when
britton@odie.ncssm.edu you have forgotten everything
North Carolina School of Science & Math you learned in school.
(919) 286-3366 x224 Albert Einstein, 1936