Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Solar power



LUDWIK KOWALSKI wrote:

A message on wind energy (from another list) is posted below. Does anybody
have a clear idea why progress in that area of technology, and in attempts
of using other forms of solar energy, is so slow. Such sources of power
are highly desirable in view of global warming.
Ludwik Kowalski
**************************************************************************
Subj: RE: wind energy

Thanks, Jean, for sharing your piece on wind energy; a good and useful
bridge from physics to a practical issue we all can benefit from. Let
me add some statistics. But first one question. Should the area of the
windmill be calculated from the area of all blades or as the area of
the entire circle?

Here are some numbers from a newspaper article:

1) Today close to 100,000 Danes own shares in the hundreds of small
cooperatives that opertate 4,700 windmills. And they are making profits.

2) 20,000 people are employed by the wind industry in Europe.

3) In wind power, Europe has already overaten the United States, which
led the drive to wind in 1980's. Europe's capacity of 4100 MW now amounts
to two and a half times that of the United States, with Germany alone
surpassing the capacity of American wind farms.

*******************************************************************
Jean wrote:
Your student is right : wind is air in motion, and you can tap the
kinetic energy of the air with a windmill.

If you consider one square meter of vertical area normal to the wind,
the amount of mass traversing it is:

area * speed * density of air ( = 1.3 Kg/cubic meter)

To obtain the corresponding energy, m v^2 /2 you obtain:

Energy = density * area * (speed)^3 /2

Where "area" is the area of the windmill. You have to use an efficiency
factor, because downstream from the windmill the wind will still have
some velocity left.

All this assumes the air acts as an incompressible fluid, which
is not a bad approximation here. Otherwise, one needs the full
Bernouli equation.

For v = 10m/sec, the energy density is

1.3 * 1000/2 = 650 watt/m^2

comparable to the solar constant at sea level ( = 1 KW/m^2), but of
course the transformation into usable form is different in both cases.

Jean OOSTENS
******************************************************************

Perhaps of some interest is the fact that farms out here on the windy
high plains used to have numerous windmills pumping water for livestock
and homes. These have largely been superceded by electrified water pumps
which are easier to control and maintain. A local radio announcer lived
across the street from me and had a modern wind generator installed in
his back yard. He sold surplus energy back to the utility company. Many
neighbors squawked resulting in the city passing an ordinance
prohibiting further installations. I suppose they were afraid it would
attract lightning and/or fall on them in a wind storm. After having
numerous problems which meant that it often was not working, he had it
taken down.

Solar and wind energy are not benign. Does anyone have figures for human
lives lost in the manufacture of photovoltaic devices and smelting of
steel and copper for wind machines?

Roger

================================
| Dr. Roger A. Pruitt |
| Department of Physics |
| Fort Hays State University |
| Hays, KS 67601 |
| Ph. (785) 628-5357 |
================================